I am using WXS standalone 8.6.0.3. I am testing in a lab environment with a simple 1 grid setup that is using 1 primary and 1 sync replicas. Currently no clients as connected and/or sending data to the grid
I am having performance problems when teardowning/starting back up container JVMs in zones which end up hanging threads.
This has caused me to start looking into some of the errors I see in FDCs when starting catalog/container servers.
1st exceptions is depth limit reached:
[8/23/13 10:05:00:669 CDT] FFDC Exception:com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.ObjectGridXIOException SourceId:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler.runXIOQueryRevisionPeerMode ProbeId:519 Reporter:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler@1738bebf
com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.ObjectGridXIOException [originating=204.53.93.118:4009;causedby=204.53.93.118:4009;exid=0]: com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.ObjectGridXIOException
at RemovedByServerSerialization.RemovedByServerSerialization(RemovedByServerSerialization:0)
Caused by: java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException
... 1 more
Reporter BEGIN:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler@1738bebf
com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler::objectGrid BEGIN:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl@3c4c463f
com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl::CLASS_NAME:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl
com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl::pendingDynamicMaps BEGIN:java.lang.ThreadLocal@510beba5
java.lang.ThreadLocal::threadLocalHashCode:-1065312117
java.lang.ThreadLocal::nextHashCode:java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger@b97df067 depth limit reached
2nd exception is:
Index Count Time of first Occurrence Time of last Occurrence Exception SourceId ProbeId
------+------+---------------------------+---------------------------+---------------------------
0 44 8/23/13 10:05:00:598 CDT 8/23/13 10:06:01:342 CDT com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.ObjectGridXIOException com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler.runXIOQueryRevisionPeerMode 519 /qual/86/logs/ffdc/86conq3Ldap_acd6f801_13.08.23_10.05.00.6578660052580514828139.txt
1 43 8/23/13 10:05:01:136 CDT 8/23/13 10:05:56:979 CDT com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.ObjectGridXIOException com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler.run 172 /qual/86/logs/ffdc/86conq3Ldap_acd6f801_13.08.23_10.05.01.1361442322238434409130.txt
More details on:
DC Exception:com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.ObjectGridXIOException SourceId:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousRe
plicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler.runXIOQueryRevisionPeerMode ProbeId:519 Reporter:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevision
ShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler@1738bebf
com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.ObjectGridXIOException [originating=204.53.93.118:4009;causedby=204.53.93.118:4009;exid=0]: com.ibm.ws.xsspi.xio.exception.Ob
jectGridXIOException
at RemovedByServerSerialization.RemovedByServerSerialization(RemovedByServerSerialization:0)
Caused by: java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException
... 1 more
Reporter BEGIN:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler@1738bebf
com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.replication.SynchronousReplicaRevisionShardImpl$RevisionPeerModeHandler::objectGrid BEGIN:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl@3c4c463
f
com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl::CLASS_NAME:com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl
com.ibm.ws.objectgrid.ObjectGridImpl::pendingDynamicMaps BEGIN:java.lang.ThreadLocal@510beba5
java.lang.ThreadLocal::threadLocalHashCode:-1065312117
java.lang.ThreadLocal::nextHashCode:java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger@b97df067 depth limit reached
java.lang.ThreadLocal::HASH_INCREMENT:1640531527
END:java.lang.ThreadLocal@510beba5
Any suggestions on how to resolve this depth limit exception?
Thanks!
Brett