Decision Optimization

Decision Optimization

Delivers prescriptive analytics capabilities and decision intelligence to improve decision-making.

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

URGENT ! Infactible model, all entries at implied bounds.

  • 1.  URGENT ! Infactible model, all entries at implied bounds.

    Posted Sat January 18, 2014 03:42 PM

    Originally posted by: fischer_07


    when i try to resolve my model the program show me that:

    "Row 'id660' infeasible, all entries at implied bounds.

    Presolve time =    0.03 sec.
    "

    i want to know what does it means, and i want to know how can i know if a boolean variable has the value 1 or 0, please help me 


    #DecisionOptimization
    #OPLusingCPLEXOptimizer


  • 2.  Re: URGENT ! Infactible model, all entries at implied bounds.

    Posted Sun January 19, 2014 05:21 AM

    Hi,

     

    can you attach your model ?

    regards


    #DecisionOptimization
    #OPLusingCPLEXOptimizer


  • 3.  Re: URGENT ! Infactible model, all entries at implied bounds.

    Posted Wed January 22, 2014 10:21 AM

    Originally posted by: fischer_07


    i send you the model, the model was running well, but then when i  added the next two restriction...:

    forall(k in J, i in 1..periodos:i<=22){  
     ((1-R[k,i])+(1-R[k,i+1])+(1-R[k,i+2]))/3==1-W[k,i];         
    }

    forall(k in J, i in 1..periodos){
    Y[k,i]<=1-R[k,i];
     }

    appeared the message

    "Row 'id660' infeasible, all entries at implied bounds.

    Presolve time =    0.03 sec.
    "

    I really appreciate all the help that you can give me.

     

    PD. the file "produccion mod" is the archive. mod, and "produccion file dat" is the archive.dat, i didnt know why i cant upload the model in a archive .rar

     

     


    #DecisionOptimization
    #OPLusingCPLEXOptimizer


  • 4.  Re: URGENT ! Infactible model, all entries at implied bounds.

    Posted Thu January 23, 2014 10:53 AM

    Hi,

    if you replace

    forall(k in J, i in 1..periodos:i<=22){  
     ((1-R[k,i])+(1-R[k,i+1])+(1-R[k,i+2]))/3==1-W[k,i];         
    }

    by

    forall(k in J, i in 1..periodos:i<=22){  
     ct:((1-R[k,i])+(1-R[k,i+1])+(1-R[k,i+2]))/3==1-W[k,i];         
    }

     

    then you get a relaxed solution

     

    [0,0]    [-0.33333,0]    ct[2][8] 
    [0,0]    [0,0.33333]    ct[2][9]

     

    regards
     


    #DecisionOptimization
    #OPLusingCPLEXOptimizer


  • 5.  Re: URGENT ! Infactible model, all entries at implied bounds.

    Posted Sat January 25, 2014 10:56 PM

    Originally posted by: fischer_07


    AlexFleischer, can you explain me what is the purpose of   ct:((1-R[k,i])+(1-R[k,i+1])+(1-R[k,i+2]))/3==1-W[k,i]; ?,    i didnt have seen that before, and i want to understand.

    what is the interpretaction to [0,0]    [-0.33333,0]    ct[2][8]       ?

                                                        [0,0]    [0,0.33333]    ct[2][9]


    #DecisionOptimization
    #OPLusingCPLEXOptimizer


  • 6.  Re: URGENT ! Infactible model, all entries at implied bounds.

    Posted Sun January 26, 2014 01:49 AM

    Hi,

     

    it means that if you add some slack in your constraint

     

    ct:((1-R[k,i])+(1-R[k,i+1])+(1-R[k,i+2]))/3==1-W[k,i];

    for k=2 i=8 and k=2 i=9 then it will help.

     

    And even stronger

     

    forall(k in J, i in 1..periodos:i<=22){  
     -0.4<=((1-R[k,i])+(1-R[k,i+1])+(1-R[k,i+2]))/3-1+W[k,i]<=0.4;         
    }

     

    will make your model feasible

     

    regards


    #DecisionOptimization
    #OPLusingCPLEXOptimizer