Maximo

Maximo

Come for answers, stay for best practices. All we're missing is you.

 View Only

  • 1.  PMCOUNTER no longer ticked by MIF Loaded WO?

    Posted Tue August 01, 2023 07:38 AM
    Folks,
     
    Many years ago, I would load WORKORDERS with MIF and if I had the PMNUM populated it would actually update the PM dates and such and also tick the PMCOUNTER. I seem to no longer be seeing Maximo tick the counter any longer.
     
    Does anyone know if IBM changed that behavior and stopped this from working any longer? Or might it be a bug in 7613?
     
    When I needed to get around the PM being updated, I used to have to load my data with my PMNUM in a place holder column, load with MIF and then use an update to move the value into the PMNUM. Was a hassle but worked.
    Here is my system information:
    App Server IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0.5.10
    Version
    Tivoli's process automation engine 7.6.1.3-IFIX20230628-1738 Build 20220823-0909 DB Build V7613-344 HFDB Build HF7613-101
    IBM Maximo Application Framework 8.8.0 Build 20220823-1257 DB Build V7600-23
    IBM Tpae Integration Framework 7.6.1.3 Build 20220823-0909 DB Build V7613-61
    IBM Maximo for Utilities 7.6.1.0-20230609-1234 Build 20230609-1234 DB Build V7610-09 HFDB Build HF7610-16
    IBM Maximo Spatial Asset Management 7.6.1.1-20230615-1651 Build 20220818-2016 DB Build V7611-24 HFDB Build HF7611-14
    IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.3 Build 20220823-0909 DB Build V7611-01
    IoT Connection Utility 7.6.0.4 Build 20220303-1642 DB Build V7604-01
    Server OS Linux 3.10.0-1160.92.1.el7.x86_64
    Server DB Oracle 19.0 (Oracle Database 19c Enterprise Edition Release 19.0.0.0.0 - Production)
     
     
     
    Thanks in advance,
    Miller


    ------------------------------
    David Miller
    Managing Partner - Maximo Consultant
    Enterprise Integration Partners LLC
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: PMCOUNTER no longer ticked by MIF Loaded WO?

    Posted Wed August 02, 2023 07:04 PM

    Hi David,

    Have seen your posts here so I am confident you are smarter than the average bear. ;) Just to be sure I am fully following you:  You are using MXWODETIAL object structure (or appropriate duplicate) with the psdi.iface.app.wo.MaxWOProcess Inbound processing class yes?

    If so, @Steven Shull any ideas? If not then (pardon for me saying this but,) try adding the inbound procession class and see what happens.

    Other than that, did you do any post processing in the past on your own?



    ------------------------------
    Bradley K. Downing , MBA
    Senior Brand Technical Specialist
    IBM
    Bakersfield CA
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 3.  RE: PMCOUNTER no longer ticked by MIF Loaded WO?

    Posted Tue August 15, 2023 09:57 AM

    Sorry for delay getting back to you Bradley. I was at MaximoWorld last week. We are actually using a custom OS with nothing but the WORKORDER MBO on it. These are very basic WO with no plans/materials etc.. I think you pointed me to my issue. They did not associate the Processing Classes on the custom OS. Will let you know.

    Miller



    ------------------------------
    David Miller
    Managing Partner - Maximo Consultant
    Enterprise Integration Partners LLC
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 4.  RE: PMCOUNTER no longer ticked by MIF Loaded WO?

    Posted Tue August 15, 2023 10:06 AM

    I actually am just seeing that the OOTB MXWO OS has no Outbound Class and the Inbound Class is psdi.iface.mic.StatefulMicSetIn.  We cloned that OS to create our custom OS. Why does this not use the psdi.iface.app.wo.MaxWOProcess  like the MXWODETAIL does? Could maybe adding that class make the difference?

    Thanks,



    ------------------------------
    David Miller
    Managing Partner - Maximo Consultant
    Enterprise Integration Partners LLC
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


Related Content