We're still in a slightly
evolved version of ATUM 2, with applications connected to business services.
Part of the
evolution covers the cases where we have something like your Alfresco, we have something I indirectly described in my ETBMA paper last year (
link):

We have frameworks for applications, and we have those as "Tools" that send their costs to all related applications.
As @Jenny Franklin wrote, we don't connect the frameworks to services, we see them as application enablers.
We're going towards a more ATUM 4-like hierarchy, implementing concepts such as IT products / solutions / platforms, but we still don't have a clear design. We're supposed to prototype it this year. I have to admit I don't quite know how to
do ATUM 4.
------------------------------
Regards, Guillermo
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-28-2022 12:46
From: Erin Kessler
Subject: Mapping Applications to Services
Hello all,
In my organization, we are associating Applications to Services (we are still using the earlier taxonomy and have not started using the "Solutions" terminology yet). There is some confusion over how we are doing the mapping and I'd like some expert advice.
My team owns a content management platform called Alfresco upon which we build custom, business-facing applications. Currently, most of the business facing applications are aligned to the Content Management service, which I think is incorrect, as CM is a platform service.
If I understand the taxonomy correctly, it seems the services of the applications should be the service of the consuming business unit. So for example, we have an application built on Alfresco used by the tax team; I think the service for this application would be Tax. And if that application is replaced by a new Tax application and only used as an archive, I think the service is still Tax, as opposed to becoming Backup & Archive.
Am I thinking about this correctly? Thanks so much in advance.
Erin
#CostingStandard(CT-Foundation)