Originally posted by: SystemAdmin
[shadi said:]
hi,
im using cplex to solve an ip problem, before some days the optimizer reached very quickly to the optimal solution (gap=0.00), now i dont know what was changed and the tool take a long long time to solve the same problem and it always write the following lines (the gap reduced very slow):
29200 17556 1.54162e+007 183 1.54219e+007 1.53336e+007 4255304 0.57%
29300 17615 1.53642e+007 172 1.54219e+007 1.53336e+007 4267140 0.57%
29400 17671 1.53451e+007 185 1.54219e+007 1.53338e+007 4281620 0.57%
29500 17728 1.54041e+007 151 1.54219e+007 1.53339e+007 4295952 0.57%
29600 17777 1.53974e+007 145 1.54219e+007 1.53339e+007 4309637 0.57%
29700 17826 1.53936e+007 166 1.54219e+007 1.53341e+007 4326397 0.57%
29800 17874 1.54191e+007 131 1.54219e+007 1.53342e+007 4338426 0.57%
29900 17925 1.53668e+007 169 1.54219e+007 1.53343e+007 4350650 0.57%
30000 17989 1.53908e+007 178 1.54219e+007 1.53344e+007 4365292 0.57%
Elapsed time = 2305.70 sec. (tree size = 246.36 MB, solutions = 17)
Nodefile size = 118.74 MB (45.21 MB after compression)
30100 18056 1.54107e+007 161 1.54219e+007 1.53345e+007 4376254 0.57%
30200 18121 1.54200e+007 148 1.54219e+007 1.53345e+007 4388388 0.57%
30300 18175 1.53741e+007 113 1.54219e+007 1.53347e+007 4402798 0.57%
30400 18231 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53348e+007 4417975 0.57%
30500 18287 1.54094e+007 164 1.54219e+007 1.53349e+007 4430055 0.56%
30600 18346 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53349e+007 4444355 0.56%
30700 18385 1.53779e+007 175 1.54219e+007 1.53351e+007 4460512 0.56%
30800 18423 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53352e+007 4478865 0.56%
30900 18481 1.54112e+007 182 1.54219e+007 1.53353e+007 4494268 0.56%
31000 18521 1.53605e+007 177 1.54219e+007 1.53355e+007 4511206 0.56%
Elapsed time = 2364.95 sec. (tree size = 253.63 MB, solutions = 17)
Nodefile size = 125.72 MB (47.80 MB after compression)
31100 18572 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53356e+007 4526829 0.56%
31200 18625 1.53948e+007 177 1.54219e+007 1.53358e+007 4541257 0.56%
31300 18685 1.53907e+007 162 1.54219e+007 1.53359e+007 4556465 0.56%
31400 18743 1.54205e+007 130 1.54219e+007 1.53360e+007 4569653 0.56%
31500 18790 1.54210e+007 160 1.54219e+007 1.53360e+007 4586345 0.56%
31600 18829 1.53934e+007 172 1.54219e+007 1.53362e+007 4601212 0.56%
31700 18892 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53362e+007 4612083 0.56%
31800 18938 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53363e+007 4626522 0.56%
31900 18984 1.53639e+007 178 1.54219e+007 1.53364e+007 4642026 0.55%
32000 19030 1.53849e+007 159 1.54219e+007 1.53366e+007 4663728 0.55%
Elapsed time = 2431.61 sec. (tree size = 260.58 MB, solutions = 17)
Nodefile size = 132.71 MB (50.38 MB after compression)
32100 19084 1.53963e+007 165 1.54219e+007 1.53367e+007 4680226 0.55%
32200 19137 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53367e+007 4697114 0.55%
32300 19196 1.54201e+007 170 1.54219e+007 1.53368e+007 4710410 0.55%
32400 19250 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53369e+007 4723415 0.55%
32500 19303 1.53809e+007 183 1.54219e+007 1.53371e+007 4739652 0.55%
32600 19366 1.53724e+007 160 1.54219e+007 1.53372e+007 4752239 0.55%
32700 19435 1.53820e+007 156 1.54219e+007 1.53373e+007 4762898 0.55%
32800 19491 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53374e+007 4775648 0.55%
32900 19531 1.54084e+007 181 1.54219e+007 1.53375e+007 4792352 0.55%
33000 19583 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53375e+007 4805933 0.55%
Elapsed time = 2495.53 sec. (tree size = 268.16 MB, solutions = 17)
Nodefile size = 140.69 MB (53.29 MB after compression)
33100 19633 1.54105e+007 140 1.54219e+007 1.53377e+007 4820741 0.55%
33200 19688 1.53768e+007 164 1.54219e+007 1.53378e+007 4834569 0.55%
33300 19740 1.53962e+007 163 1.54219e+007 1.53379e+007 4848859 0.54%
33400 19792 1.53873e+007 160 1.54219e+007 1.53380e+007 4860936 0.54%
33500 19852 1.53725e+007 178 1.54219e+007 1.53380e+007 4873458 0.54%
33600 19910 1.53844e+007 189 1.54219e+007 1.53380e+007 4886703 0.54%
33700 19971 1.54097e+007 166 1.54219e+007 1.53381e+007 4898033 0.54%
33800 20024 1.54146e+007 170 1.54219e+007 1.53382e+007 4910659 0.54%
33900 20066 cutoff 1.54219e+007 1.53382e+007 4925090 0.54%
34000 20132 1.54032e+007 151 1.54219e+007 1.53383e+007 4936701 0.54%
.
.
.
how i can solve this problem??????
thanks in advanced
#DecisionOptimization#OPLusingCPLEXOptimizer