IBM cloesd the ticket, but they only send an RPQ to newer versions, but as far as I know, the "issue" (that not an issue because ports are working normally) degraded mode is still on.
No good news at the moment.
Original Message:
Sent: Sun September 29, 2024 09:08 PM
From: Larry Hao
Subject: Flashsystem 5045 Ports in DEGRADED mode
Hi Urtzi,
Just a follow up on this thread. Did IBM successfully close your support ticket and resolve the issue in new spectrum virtualize release ?
We have a client asking for the same question in a very similar configuration, a Power 10 server directly attaches to a FS5045, without SAN switches. NPIV is expected to be enabled.
Would like to see if your case is a good example. Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Larry Hao
------------------------------
Larry Hao
Original Message:
Sent: Wed March 27, 2024 09:37 AM
From: Urtzi Larrieta Alvarez
Subject: Flashsystem 5045 Ports in DEGRADED mode
Hello:
Thank for your reply. I opened a case and they told me that IBM is working in a new APAR HU02431 in order to solve the degraded status, because NPIV "is" supported in direct attach configurations also with new 8.6.0.X firmwares, and the issue is only a "cosmetic" problem in version 8.6.0.3 and newer versions that, as they told me, are working to solve.
So thank you for all your replies, and this thread can be closed for now.
Best regards,
Urtzi Larrieta
------------------------------
Urtzi Larrieta Alvarez
Original Message:
Sent: Wed March 27, 2024 12:55 AM
From: Anup Regmi
Subject: Flashsystem 5045 Ports in DEGRADED mode
Hi Urtzi
Earlier, I configured the same with FS5045 storage and a P8 server with a single VIOS. In a similar configuration, I faced the same issue with the online host and degraded ports for all hosts in P8 servers (VIOS and multiple LPARS).
As per my knowledge, this is a limitation (or say, normal behavior) for the directly connected storage as the single port of a host won't be able to communicate to both controllers of storage in any case. Also, as a host can communicate with both controllers of storage using multiple different ports there is no SPOF.
------------------------------
Anup Regmi
Original Message:
Sent: Sun March 10, 2024 07:54 PM
From: Urtzi Larrieta Alvarez
Subject: Flashsystem 5045 Ports in DEGRADED mode
Hello:
We have a Flashsystem 5045 storage directly attached to a IBM POWER9 that has 2 4ports 16Gbps fiber channel cards, and each card is attached to a VIOS, so we have 2 VIOS using 4 port fiber-channel ports.
The 8 fiber-channel ports (4 for each controller) are connected this way (in order to have no SPOF):
Port 1 controller 1 is connected to port 1 first FC POWER9 card
Port 2 controller 1 is connected to port 2 first FC POWER9 card
Port 3 controller 1 is connected to port 1 second FC POWER9 card
Port 4 controller 1 is connected to port 2 second FC POWER9 card
Port 1 controller 2 is connected to port 3 first FC POWER9 card
Port 2 controller 2 is connected to port 4 first FC POWER9 card
Port 3 controller 2 is connected to port 3 second FC POWER9 card
Port 4 controller 2 is connected to port 4 second FC POWER9 card
The issue raises when we start the VIOS and try to connect each VIOS to the FS5045. We creatd two hosts, VIOS1 and VIOS2 and the FC cards are autodetectd, so in each hosts we add 4 WWN corresponding to each port of the FC cards of the POWER9. Then we create volumes, attach them to each VIOS and then we boot and install VIOS OS and everything without issues. Ports are direct attached and are negotiating at 16 Gbps.
BUT, if we list the HOST on the FS5045 GUI, the Hosts are online with the green "OK" but if we enter to properties, and select "Ports" tab, the 4 ports appear as DEGRADED and yellow sign.
The access is normal, we installed several LPARs and VIOS don't show any errors, nor errpt issues, but the FS5045 is reporting DEGRADED status in the ports. FS5045 also don't report any issues. The FS5045 has 8.6.0.0 firmware. The machine is working in NPIV mode.
So, my question is: How can we solve the DEGRADED status of each ports and get the ONLINE and "green" status?
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards,
Urtzi Larrieta
------------------------------
Urtzi Larrieta Alvarez
------------------------------