IBM i Global

IBM i Global

Connect, learn, share, and engage with IBM Power.

 View Only
  • 1.  Merlin

    Posted Mon March 24, 2025 12:22 PM

    According to the Fortra Survey at https://www.fortra.com/resources/guides/ibm-i-marketplace-survey-results/initiatives  under application development tools Merlin is used by 2% of IBM i shops.  While RDi and Visual Studio Code are neck and neck at 54% and 53%.

    So, does one attend the IBM i Guided Tour on Merlin on Wednesday or not?


    ------------------------------
    Robert Berendt IBMChampion
    Business Systems Analyst, Lead
    Dekko
    Fort Wayne
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Merlin

    Posted 30 days ago

    If we subscribed to the notion that adoption equates with quality, we'd be in the wrong industry. :)



    ------------------------------
    Steven Riedmueller
    Certified IBM i Admin
    Speaker, Mentor, and Advocate
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Merlin

    Posted 30 days ago

    From the survey, 77% are still using SEU/PDM. 

    For some of them, Merlin might be the correct choice or it might be RDi or VSCode.  Hopefully, they see the options they have and they try one.  On Wednesday, I'll show Merlin so they can learn about that option. 



    ------------------------------
    Eric Simpson
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Merlin

    Posted 30 days ago

    There was enough discussion over on the midrange-l list that I've decided to sit in on this.



    ------------------------------
    Robert Berendt IBMChampion
    Business Systems Analyst, Lead
    Dekko
    Fort Wayne
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Merlin

    Posted 29 days ago

    I think the survey can be misleading in cases like this.  For example, I know many people who use RDi or Code for i who also use PDM because it is much easier to use for some tasks than Code for i and even RTDi in some cases. Few of those people are using SEU but they will from time to time for a quick edit of (say) a CL member. The way the question is posed in the survey inflates the usage level I think.



    ------------------------------
    Jon Paris
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Merlin

    Posted 28 days ago
    Edited by ace ace 28 days ago

    Agreed. There is no mutual exclusion between tools. You use a screwdriver, or scapel, when needed.

    This isn't even a discussion in *nix world or a problem... one can use nano, emacs, vi, or visual tools... nobody sees problem there.

    So to SEU or not SEU is a false dichotomy.

    The problematic thing is that, according to the data above, SEU is still hit a lot ... so the big question is why the vendor IBM EOS'ed it in terms of evolution... cmon... at list fix syntax checking for **FREE members.

    And going to sources from members to IFS stream as "better" solution is going back in time. More open and compatible, yes, better, no.

    If even source should should be stored in even more structured DB format, allowing a lot of structured metadata per line of code, contextual to it, to aid even external revision/audit tools.

    --ft



    ------------------------------
    --ft
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Merlin

    Posted 28 days ago
    I agree about the false dichotomy, but don't agree with you about updating SEU.  It would cost a lot of $s to implement it and for what?  The hard core SEU users are still using fixed format which it does well.

    Remember the survey doesn't really tell you much about SEU usage as it is bundled with PDM.  I still use PDM a bit but don't use SEU at all.