On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 06:00:48PM +0000, Gerald Stephens via IBM TechXchange Community wrote:
> Section 5.9.1 of Redbook "Oracle on IBM Power Systems" (sg248485)
> recommends to limit LUNs to 512 GB. Is that recommendation still
> considered current?
That does sound really small. I use 1T or 2T LUNs, because I want at
least 4 LUNs in any VG for interdisk PP striping. If you have growth,
always add another 4 LUNs minimum to avoid hot LUNs.
Why not use 16 x 1T LUNs, and a scalable VG? You can add 4 x 1T for
growth each year with reasonable balance and not have to do a reorgvg.
I'd also suggest using multiple filesystems in the VG. Don't have a
filesystem that would take longer to fsck than you can handle
downtime. For instance, you might have your 16TB VG, but make each
JFS2 filesystem 4TB (ie: /u01-/u04). If you have to fsck, you can run
4 FS in parallel.
Be sure to doublecheck your hdisk attributes to enable active/active
pathing, which may need no_reserve set. Increase your queue depth as
well.
Good luck!
------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell Adams
Russell.Adams@AdamsSystems.nlPrincipal Consultant Adams Systems Consultancy
https://adamssystems.nl/
Original Message:
Sent: 11/5/2025 1:01:00 PM
From: Gerald Stephens
Subject: Max LUN size with Oracle
Section 5.9.1 of Redbook "Oracle on IBM Power Systems" (sg248485) recommends to limit LUNs to 512 GB. Is that recommendation still considered current?
Trying to spec a new LPAR for oracle database server installation, and the database is currently 16TB in size.
Keeping with the multiple of 8 for # of LUNS, start with 48 LUNS that are 400GB, and every few years ask SAN team to expand the LUNS by 50GB, to accommodate for growth?
------------------------------
Gerald Stephens
------------------------------