Aside from the technical and licensing issues, I have a question for you regarding the work order history against assets going forward. Presumably the contractor is taking care of some subset of the Assets and or locations for you Org/ Site combination, and it is not all of the Assets and or Locations. If you segregate the data, how do you propose to put it all back together for consistent and cumulative reporting on your asset reliability and total cost of ownership for your asset management strategy?
It might be preferable to other tools and techniques to limit access to your database for your contractor. Application restrictions, data restrictions, security groups, etc. Perhaps I am missing something here or am reading into your words here. What is the business objective? Simply separating the data is all well and good but it may introduce other problems and be more difficult to resolve down the road depending on what you are trying to accomplish.
------------------------------
Bradley K. Downing , MBA
IBM Certified Adv. Deployment Prof. Maximo v7.6.1
IBM
Bakersfield CA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Wed March 31, 2021 02:16 PM
From: david spoor
Subject: mass Workorder deletion
Our company wants to use their maximo database to copy to another instance which will be used by one of our contract companies. Once copied, we want to delete 'most' of the workorders and related data in the system and leave only workorders that pertain to the contractor. Is there a 'proper' method of doing this?
------------------------------
david spoor
------------------------------
#AssetandFacilitiesManagement
#Maximo