Originally posted by: mhhelle
I have 2 servers that are supposed to be configured identically that are not behaving the same way. I suspect that patching is not up to date on one of them. They both show the same maintenance levels:
prompt>instfix -i |grep ML
All filesets for 5.2.0.0_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-01_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-02_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-03_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-04_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-05_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-06_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-07_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-08_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-09_AIX_ML were found.
All filesets for 5200-10_AIX_ML were found.
And they show the same oslevels:
prompt>oslevel -s
5200-10-05-0819
But if I look at all the individual "All filesets for IYXXXXX were found." and "Not all filesets for IYXXXXX were found." messages from "instfix -i" I see a few differences where they are found on one server but not the other (one shows the below and the other shows the same but "not found"):
All filesets for IY78159 were found.
All filesets for IY78873 were found.
All filesets for IY78922 were found.
All filesets for IY78923 were found.
All filesets for IY78924 were found.
All filesets for IY78930 were found.
All filesets for IY78932 were found.
All filesets for IY78933 were found.
All filesets for IY79071 were found.
All filesets for IY79422 were found.
All filesets for IY80656 were found.
All filesets for IY80737 were found.
I was told that since all the maintenance levels are up to date that we should ignore these differences, because they were likely due to manual installation of those filesets in question. I'm suspicious of this answer.
Is it true that since they have the same ML and oslevel -s output that they have identical patches applied? Or are the 12 individual fileset messages above really differences between the two servers?
#AIX-Forum