Primary Storage

 View Only
  • 1.  SVC + FS7300 Encryption

    Posted Mon October 23, 2023 04:52 AM

    Hello,

    I'm starting a deployment where the customer has encryption licenses on the backend storage (FS7300 with FCMs) and on the frontend (SVC3).

    The request is to enable encryption with USB + key servers.

    Usually I see deployment with SVC where only the backend storage is encrypted, in this scenario makes sense to activate encryption on both the frontend and backend? what's the best practice?

    thanks



    ------------------------------
    Davide Galbussera
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: SVC + FS7300 Encryption

    IBM Champion
    Posted Mon October 23, 2023 07:00 AM
    Definitely do the encryption on the FlashSystem. The SVC does encryption through the software, so it is additional overhead. The FlashSystem does encryption through its drives and the USB drives are just used for the keys. No additional overhead required and gets the same results.

    Regards,
    Ian Wright
    Mainline Information Systems 
    301-514-0758





  • 3.  RE: SVC + FS7300 Encryption

    Posted Mon November 27, 2023 01:56 PM

    Hi,

    Is it possible to to disable the encryption in the FS7300 Side (FCM) ?

    Thanks, 

    Alex



    ------------------------------
    Alex Aclan
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: SVC + FS7300 Encryption

    IBM Champion
    Posted Mon November 27, 2023 04:23 PM
    You can disable encryption via the CLI, but the catch is that you can't do it if there are any encrypted objects.

    If you fit this narrow description then it would be chencryption -usb diable or chencryption -keyserver disable

    Regards,

    Ian R Wright

    Client Technical Sales Engineer

    Mainline Information Systems

    Specializing in Mainframe and Open Storage, Linux, Ansible, Containers/Cloud 

     

    ian.wright@mainline.com

    301-514-0758   

     

            

     

     






  • 5.  RE: SVC + FS7300 Encryption

    IBM Champion
    Posted Tue October 24, 2023 03:00 AM

    Hello Davide,
    The problem is that the encryption (Data at Rest), if you use it on the SVC, will negatively affect the compression of the FCMs in the FlashSystem. Therefore the best practice is to encrypt this on the flash system. Encryption on the SVC should only be used on storage systems that are not capable of it themselves.

    Greetings Patrik



    ------------------------------
    Patrik Groß
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: SVC + FS7300 Encryption

    User Group Leader
    Posted Tue October 24, 2023 04:27 AM

    The general rule is to do Encryption after compression (otherwise the data is not compressible).

    If you are using DRP compression, then the SVC is an appropriate place to do the encryption (and it uses AES-NI commands in Intel which are marginally impacting, but generally speaking, that is not significant in an SVC appliance).

    However, if you are relying on FCMs for the compression, it is better to do the encryption for the data at rest on the FlashSystem (as the drives are all SED).  This ensures best compression savings + encryption of data at rest.

    There are other considerations such as how much of the data is on the network unencrypted and what your security policies are, however, the above should sort the basic case for encryption of data at rest.



    ------------------------------
    Evelyn Perez
    IBM Senior Technical Staff Member
    IBM Storage Virtualize Software Architect for SVC and FlashSystem
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: SVC + FS7300 Encryption

    Posted Tue October 24, 2023 05:20 AM

    Thanks for the feedback, as DRP won't be used, we proceed with encrypt only the Flashsystem.



    ------------------------------
    Davide Galbussera
    ------------------------------