Start collaborating
Learn more about TechXchange Dev Days virtual and in-person events here
Join this online user group to communicate across Z Security product users and IBM experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.
Hi Joe, Were you able to get this working? ------------------------------ Kenneth Whitfield ------------------------------
Hi Rob, that must have been it. With the preamble SIMULATE ACCESS_FALLBACK_DEFAULT, this discrepancy no longer occurs. Thanks again. Kind regards, Stephan ...
Hello Rob, thanks for the reply. I'll give it a try and get back to you. Kind regards, Stephan ------------------------------ Stephan Reichelt ------- ...
Hi Stephan I'm wondering, did you select a CKFREEZE data set that was collected on the same LPAR that sourced the ACCESS records? The Access Monitor simulation ...
Stephan, if all is well the AM COMPARE function (AM.2) compares the outcome of the original access check against the outcome of the simulated access check against ...
Hello Tom, First of all, thank you very much for your quick reply. Regarding the topic: That's what's confusing me. The historical file was only from the previous ...
Hi Stephan, I am not sure whether I fully understand the scenario that you describe, but I am going to attempt to answer your question anyway. The access ...
Hello everyone, I ran a compare via AM.2. I used the file from the previous day as the historical file. Since my permissions have not changed, the result should ...
Hi Linnea, Your requirement as stated can only work if you have but a single tag/value combination for each factor, as in general MFA_FACTOR_TAG_VALUE is not "beside" ...
Get hands-on with the newest tech, meet experts, and code with your peers.
Mon October 06, 2025 09:00 AM - Thu October 09, 2025 05:00 PM ET Orlando FL