Originally posted by: TarunB
Tim
You'll be able to get more comprehensive statistics from the IBM support team, but from my experience Linux deployments of WTX are probably very rare. Windows/WTX implementations are also somewhat rare on an enterprise scale, though ironically I am working on one at the moment.
Overwhelmingly, the majority of WTX implementations I have worked on have been on some flavour of Unix, such as AIX, Solaris or HP-UX. The reason for clients choosing these is perhaps just largely down to enterprise wide decision making, but technically I have seen WTX worked immensely on 24/7 global operations on these OS so am quite happy to validate those decisions.
Horses for courses I guess. Windows servers, if built appropriately, can handle a decent sized operation too. I never thought I'd say that, but it's proven by the system I'm working on right now. There's no reason why Linux wouldn't be able to prove a suitable host for WTX too, especially given it's similarity to Unix based operating systems.
In general, Windows will most likely be easier to manage, especially seeing as WTX doesn't often require deep technical configuration, but the OS licensing costs will be more. Having said that, the decision for your client may well be determined by what other applications form part of their integration architecture, and by what platform they are able to support with exising capabilities.
Best of luck,
Tarun
#DataExchange#IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender#IBMSterlingTransformationExtender