Hi, Just wondering whether this is a Workspace bug or a feature - and whether IBM have plans to address this.
The issue is that I have a limited period field with both discrete and YTD as elements however, I want to show BOTH of them, but controlled from a single filter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WITHMEMBER [GPL-Value Type].[GPL-Value Type].[MTH] AS ([GPL-Value Type].[GPL-Value Type].[MMR Value],STRTOMEMBER((("[GPL-Year Period].[GPL-Year Period].[" + [GPL-Year Period].[GPL-Year Period].CURRENTMEMBER.NAME)) + "]")),FORMAT_STRING='#,##0;(#,##0);0'MEMBER [GPL-Value Type].[GPL-Value Type].[YTD] AS ([GPL-Value Type].[GPL-Value Type].[MMR Value],STRTOMEMBER((((((("[GPL-Year Period].[GPL-Year Period].[" + LEFT([GPL-Year Period].[GPL-Year Period].CURRENTMEMBER.NAME , 4))) + " YTD ")) + RIGHT([GPL-Year Period].[GPL-Year Period].CURRENTMEMBER.NAME , 2))) + "]")),FORMAT_STRING='#,##0;(#,##0);0'SELECT {[GPL-Data Source].[GPL-Data Source].[Reporting Total]} DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME, MEMBER_NAME, MEMBER_CAPTION, LEVEL_NUMBER, CHILDREN_CARDINALITY ON 0,HEAD({[GPL-Value Type].[GPL-Value Type].[MTH],[GPL-Value Type].[GPL-Value Type].[YTD]}, 100000) DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME, MEMBER_NAME, MEMBER_CAPTION, LEVEL_NUMBER, CHILDREN_CARDINALITY ON 1
... and so on ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe the issue is the Syntax, as this works beautifully in PAx however - when the view is saved and brought into a PAw workbook - something happens with how PAW translates the MDX, instead replacing ALL dimension elements to .MEMBER and preventing anything being selected, changed, manually changed and saved .. pretty much anything. It becomes a static view on the elements that were saved.
working through this bit by bit - it seems to be when the LEFT statement is applied ... wonder whether there are any recommended workarounds or if there's a fix coming.
many thanks
------------------------------
David Ramos
------------------------------
#PlanningAnalyticswithWatson