Originally posted by: jvanboga
It really depends on how your intial map and type tree were setup. The problem is if your original map had all the respective rules at the runmap level file level output rules may have looked like 'field1:record:file' The rule at the funtional map level would probably look more like 'field1:record'.
You could create a new runmap that calls a functional map that would work on the record level. At that time you'd copy the output card from your current map to the new map, update the card's 'Type' and then replace in the card from 'record:file' to 'record'.
#IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender#IBMSterlingTransformationExtender#DataExchange