webMethods

webMethods

Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Using TPA to generate Functional acknowledgement (997) but wrong EDI version is showing in payload

  • 1.  Using TPA to generate Functional acknowledgement (997) but wrong EDI version is showing in payload

    Posted 10 hours ago

    Hello all

    I am working on a demo in webMethods B2B (SaaS) where I send an X12 4010 850 into wM B2B using Postman. Then I have a processing rule that calls an integration flow service in wM Integration (SaaS) using an Action.

    This all works fine.

    But now I want to have a Functional Acknowledgement (997) be automatically generated, so I configured my Trading Partner Agreement to do this.

    In the TPA I set autoGenerateFA to ON
    It seems my 997 is being generated but it does not seem to be using EDI version 4010. Why do I know this? Well, if I look in the Transaction Monitoring I see the 997 but it is not logged separately. It appears as a related transaction here (last row):
    Also, when I open the last highlighted entry, and look at the transaction Attributes it shows EDI version of 00200. I believe this should be 00401 ???  (that's what my research tells me anyway)
       
    Is there something I need to set to change the EDI version on my Functional Acknowledgements? I have been looking in the TPA and various other places but I do not see how to make the EDI Version in the auto generated 997 be 00401 instead of 00200.
    If anyone has any ideas, please share.
    Regards
    Wayne


    ------------------------------
    Wayne Leishman
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Using TPA to generate Functional acknowledgement (997) but wrong EDI version is showing in payload

    Posted 5 hours ago

    do you see any list of document types, which has Functional Acknowledgement 997 ? check if any version mentioned for it ? 



    ------------------------------
    Developer EDI
    ------------------------------