Correct. The initial/first also fail indicating its duplicate with the second EDIINT. I have the hypothesis that before the first EDIINT was extracted, the 2nd EDIINT was received and both were tagged as duplicate of each other. Any thought?
As for TP, we are also reaching out to them. I just want to know for now any input from experts why EDIINTs are being ignored without processing the first.
Note: We are seeing this type of failure on the EDIINT sent 3 or more times.
#webMethods#edi#Integration-Server-and-ESB