In dev you have active/passive? Hmm. I get using active/passive in test to mimic what is in prod. But for dev, seems excessive?
Did you have active/passive with Broker Server in dev?
In any case, I do not know how to get a single UM instance to support independent “message networks” the way Broker Server does with Broker. Perhaps someone else has an approach – would be interested to hear what it might be. Given that IS publishing and subscribing is all based upon document type, unless there is a way at the IS level to segregate published docs there may not be an approach with a single UM. Client prefix comes to mind but I don’t think that segregates things – just helps with publish order and subscriber “clustering”.
#Universal-Messaging-Broker#webMethods