Originally posted by: repanzer1
Is there any reason you don't just set the field in the type tree to binary and just populate it in the map, populating it based on the presence of the elements in the XML?
Anytime I have a request such as yours and I'm not sure what to do, I build a simple map with just an output card, and have a bunch of fields, and set one to text, another to binary, another to packed decimal, then I populate each with the same value, then view it and see what I got.
Setting fields in a copy book to USAGE=COMP (or COMP-3, or what ever), is the extent of binary use I have done. I guess I just don't understand why someone would use binary, I mean, when it comes down to it, all characters or data is processed as binary at the lowest level the computer processes in. Like, if I type the ASCII character "A", which is HEX 41, the computer breaks it down to binary none the less, I thought.
Any one have any info in regards to that?
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
#IBMSterlingTransformationExtender#IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender#DataExchange