IBM Sterling Transformation Extender

Sterling Transformation Extender

Come for answers, stay for best practices. All we're missing is you.


#Sterling
#Supplychain
 View Only
  • 1.  rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/06/05 10:30 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    Cmgr genersting reject file
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    X12 Error ThreadID: edi0000013200504060000oi
    April 6, 2005 - 12:17:03

    PASSX12.mmc -

    Sender ISA Qual/ID : ZZID_SENDER
    Sender App ID : ID_SENDER
    Receiver ISA Qual/ID : ZZID_RECEIVER
    Receiver App ID : ID_RECEIVER
    The following error message was returned from the delivery map
    Error data follows:
    Interchange 1 failed to be delivered to Post Office 834

    Adapter : FILE
    Command : FILE d:\VALID\OUTPUT\PATH\
    Filename edi0000013200504060001oi.834
    Error Msg : -99999 - Adapter not found

    End of X12 Error
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The output path is valid and all 834 files are send to the same destination. so, it isn't an autho prob.

    Any ideas?
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 2.  Re: rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/07/05 04:54 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    File path shows you are running Windows. Error message indicated memory corruption as a possible cause. There should never be a situation where the file adapter can't be found.

    If you can reproduce with the same data (on your test server), great, we have a test case, but with Windows, since there are no good free OS debugging tools, trying to figure out what happened is not easy without a reproducible test case.
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange


  • 3.  Re: rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/07/05 05:09 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    The "Adapter Not Found" error with the File adapter, does not actually mean that the adapter could not physically be found.

    The actual error is that the file could not be written to the path. This particular adapter does not produce a "Target not available", via the PUT statement (which is what is used to deliver the data in Commerce Manager 7.0 for Files).

    The problem may be that it is a Networked Drive you are writing to, that the User that is running the Windows Event Server, has not mapped. Causing the data to fail to be delivered (as the drive is not available).

    If the user running the Event Server is "LocalUser", then this is most likely the cause. Try running the service under your own user ID (as a test), as if your drives are automatically reconnected at logon, this particular networked drive will be available at that time.[/quote]
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange


  • 4.  Re: rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/07/05 10:32 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    The user running the services has admin rights and the path is both a partition on the machine and defined with shares.

    I don't believe its a security or 'path not found' issue because the output path is always the same, d:\postoffice\out\variable_filename.extention. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I also changes the path (which is define as an input) to the share name '\\server\folder\variable_filename.extention'. Acts the same way. Some work, some don't.

    The other day, I opened Cmgr/PtnrMgr and re-imported the 'StructureValidation.detl' file and ran the wizard. I then redeployed Msg_Mgr.msl. Seems like made the situation a little better, but, today I'm getting rejects like crazy. We are toward the end of an upgrade from 6.5.2 so I ran it the files through 6.1 Cmgr and they passed no prob.

    Any thoughts?
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange


  • 5.  Re: rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/08/05 05:22 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    What version are you upgrading to? If it is 7.5.1, did you get the patch for EC60894? Do you have any otherrepid release or patches for CM applied?

    Is there anything about the file names (the ones that fail) that could have some commonality? If you re-run the input does it fail again?
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender


  • 6.  Re: rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/08/05 08:36 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    Sorry, 6.7.1 windows. think we'll probably wait for 8.0 for our next upgrade. This upgrade is tied to another system upgrade and don't want to byte off more than we can chew.
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 7.  Re: rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/11/05 07:13 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    From what I have seen so far. 8.x should be the version of choice for most customers until a later version comes along. A lot of the enhancements that have been request are getting into this, plus better debugging, logging, profiling etc. There still might be a chance to become a beta tester. Contact support or your sales person asap.
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 8.  Re: rejecting valid file...

    Posted 04/18/05 11:13 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    Beta testing begins end of this month. :)

    Really like what I'm seeing in the way of new features. Dynamically turning on trace/logs, debugging by stepping thru code and being able to see where the map is spending its time.... stand out as some of the nicest enhancements.
    #DataExchange
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender