Hi,

since we have updated our workspace to RBD 9.5 (Dojo Widgets 2.3) we have performance problems with the Datagrid Editor Behaviors.

In the Editor Behaviors of the Datagrid we put DojoComboBoxs in one column.

Like this:

    function EditorBehaviors(grid DataGrid in, cell Widget in, rowData any in, rowIndex int in, column DataGridColumn in, value any in) returns(Widget)        if(column.name == "column")            DojoComboBox DojoComboBox{value = value, editable = false, onChange ::= TEST_onChange, width = 160, values = values, disabled = true};            cell.children =[DojoComboBox];        end    end

Hi Marcel,

It looks normal when I try your code. Do you have a full test case?  What version do you compare to?

Hi,

thanks for your reply.

I compare it to RBD 9.0.

It occurs only if you have more than 200 rows.

Sometimes Firefox asks if i want to stop the JavaScript because it's not responding.

If i replace the Dojo Widgets by the 'normal' IBM widgets it's a lot of faster.

I attached a sample.

Kind regards!

Hi Marcel,

I did not find obvious differences between 9.0 and 9.5. I made a project to test the Datagrid loading time, they don't have much difference. Attach my test project. Run EditorGridPerformance RUIHandler can get the loading time in the bottom of the page.

Hi,

thank you!

But I can't download it...

Updated the attachment. Should work now.

Thank you,

the loading time is okay.

But the editor behavior takes a long time to put the dojo widgets in the grid.

(Also in your example)

Here you can see the content of row 3 is already there.

But it takes very long to create and fill the dojo widgets.

Yes, the render of Dojo widgets is slow, but it happens in both versions. I can't see any difference between v9 and v9.5 on loading the dojo widgets in the example.  Can you use paging to avoid creating so many widgets at once?

Is there a way to speed it up?

Yes in some programs we are using paging, but in some prgrams it's not wanted from the customer.

In this programs we use the IBM widgets because they are faster.

But the handling of the IBM widgets is not as good as the handling of the dojo widgets.

That workaround is not satisfactory...