Originally posted by: jvanboga
The mapping shouldn't be that hard if the input data is organized properly. The hard part is...
1. Building a compliant type tree.
2. Building a compliant 837.
3. Building a compliant type tree.
Accepting inbound 837 data from multiple sources is also more difficult than creating an outbound 837 for multiple destinations. In the first case you need to be able to accept any HIPAA compliant 837 and deal with all the allowable variations in interpretation. The second is simply building an 837 that meet the HIPAA compliance requirements.
The difficult part of the outbound 837 is to meet all levels of compliance. If you can do that, in theory, any TP receiving the 837 is required to accept it. In most cases though, there ends up being some give and take on both ends of the transaction.
Again, I'd recommend using the HIPAA package. I also recommend, if you don't already have it/them, getting a copy of the 837 implementation guides. A few years ago they were free from WPC and there was a link at the WEDI site. You may have to pay for them now. They have been a lifesaver in compliance related issues here. If we get a file from someone and it's a problem we point to the section and verse found in the guides to help our TP get it right. I believe we have become a highly credible source of answers for all of our TPs.
#DataExchange#IBMSterlingTransformationExtender#IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender