IBM Verify

IBM Verify

Join this online user group to communicate across Security product users and IBM experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only

  • 1.  ISAM policy servers load balancing.

    Posted 05/08/20 04:28 PM
    Hi:
    I have an ISAM cluster configured with two policy servers, on the other hand I have one ISIM server with one service for ISAM configured, that ISIM service uses a TDI instance to perform ISAM users administracion, TDI configuration has been set to comunicate to the primary policy server on the ISAM cluster, there is any way to setup Policy servers load balancing? In that case what would be the network protocol to setup on the load balancing?. The goal is that in case the primary Policy server becomes unavailable the TDI configuration can contact the secondary policy server promoted as primary. Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    ------------------------------
    David Vicenteño
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: ISAM policy servers load balancing.

    Posted 05/11/20 05:07 AM
    The ISAM Runtime for Java does not support load balancing - it only provides failover.  You can configure it with more than one Policy Server and Authorization Server such that when the highest ranked server is unreachable, it will try the next highest ranked server as alternative etc.

    Ref: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSPREK_9.0.7/com.ibm.isam.doc/develop/authj/ameb_authjava_guide/concept/con_svrsslcfg.html


    ------------------------------
    ---------------------
    Phil Goodman
    IBM ISAM Support
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: ISAM policy servers load balancing.

    Posted 05/12/20 10:56 AM
    Thank you very much Phil, it helped me a lot. Regards.

    ------------------------------
    David Vicenteño
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 4.  RE: ISAM policy servers load balancing.

    Posted 05/13/20 10:05 AM
    Hi David, Checkout Registry Direct Java API link below. It might eliminate dependency on Policy Server.


    https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSPREK_7.0.0/com.ibm.isam.doc_70/ameb_adminjava_guide/concept/con_reg_dir_java_api.html


    Regards,
    Rama

    ------------------------------
    Rama Yenumula
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: ISAM policy servers load balancing.

    Posted 05/13/20 04:46 PM
    Thank you very much Rama. It helps me a lot.

    ------------------------------
    David Vicenteño
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 6.  RE: ISAM policy servers load balancing.

    Posted 05/15/20 03:36 PM
    Hi,
    We are moving from PD.jar API to Registry Direct API and we would like to know the best practice concerning the permission on LDAP.
    On DN: SECAUTHORIY=DEFAULT, we gave this read permission for the service account:
    access-id:UID=ACCESSMANAGER-XXXX,OU=SERVICEACCOUNTS,DC=CA,DC=TENANTX:normal:rsc

    On DN: secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORIY=DEFAULT, we gave this write permission for the service account:
    access-id:UID=ACCESSMANAGER-XXXX,OU=SERVICEACCOUNTS,DC=CA,DC=TENANTX:normal:rwsc:object:ad

    This write access will give the permission to the service account to modify the group cn=iv-admin,cn=SecurityGroups,secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORITY=DEFAULT and other resources.


    The DN cn=Users,secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORITY=DEFAULT inherit his permission from secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORIY=DEFAULT.
    We are thinking about adding the write access only on cn=Users,secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORITY=DEFAULT. Is it a good practice?


    Thanks
    ------------------------------
    Martin Caron
    ------------------------------


    ------------------------------
    Martin Caron
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


  • 7.  RE: ISAM policy servers load balancing.

    Posted 05/15/20 03:37 PM

    Hi,

    We are moving from PD.jar API to Registry Direct API  and we would like to know the best practice concerning the permission on LDAP.

    On DN: SECAUTHORIY=DEFAULT,  we gave this read permission for the service account:

    access-id:UID=ACCESSMANAGER-XXXX,OU=SERVICEACCOUNTS,DC=CA,DC=TENANTX:normal:rsc

     

    On DN: secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORIY=DEFAULT, we gave this write permission for the service account:

    access-id:UID=ACCESSMANAGER-XXXX,OU=SERVICEACCOUNTS,DC=CA,DC=TENANTX:normal:rwsc:object:ad

     

    This write access will give the permission to the service account to modify the group cn=iv-admin,cn=SecurityGroups,secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORITY=DEFAULT and other resources.

     

    The DN  cn=Users,secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORITY=DEFAULT inherit his permission from secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORIY=DEFAULT. 

    We are thinking about adding the write access only on on cn=Users,secAuthority=tenantX,cn=Subdomains,SECAUTHORITY=DEFAULT.  Is it a good practice?

     

     

    Thanks



    ------Original Message------

    Hi David, Checkout Registry Direct Java API link below. It might eliminate dependency on Policy Server.


    https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSPREK_7.0.0/com.ibm.isam.doc_70/ameb_adminjava_guide/concept/con_reg_dir_java_api.html


    Regards,
    Rama

    ------------------------------
    Rama Yenumula
    ------------------------------


Related Content