IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

inoload vs Tamino Interactive Interface load

  • 1.  inoload vs Tamino Interactive Interface load

    Posted Mon February 23, 2009 07:53 PM

    How come these two tools require different formats for inputting data? I want to load a 500+MB XML file and TII is ok with the file being

    <collection_name></collection_name>
    <collection_name></collection_name>
    <collection_name></collection_name>
    <collection_name></collection_name>
    <collection_name></collection_name>

    whereas inoload requires

    <collection_name></collection_name>
    <collection_name></collection_name>
    <collection_name></collection_name>
    <collection_name></collection_name>

    Do these tools not use the same engine for loading data?


    #API-Management
    #Tamino
    #webMethods


  • 2.  RE: inoload vs Tamino Interactive Interface load

    Posted Tue February 24, 2009 12:00 PM

    For valid file formats please refer to chapter “Requests using X-Machine Commands”, section “The _process command” and to chapter “The Tamino Data Loader”, section “Input and Output File Formats” (“Using the Data Loader with One Single Input File”) in the Tamino documentation.


    #Tamino
    #webMethods
    #API-Management


  • 3.  RE: inoload vs Tamino Interactive Interface load

    Posted Wed February 25, 2009 02:16 PM

    No, actually, they don


    #webMethods
    #API-Management
    #Tamino


Related Content