IBM Sterling Transformation Extender

Sterling Transformation Extender

Come for answers, stay for best practices. All we're missing is you.


#Sterling
 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

IBM Integration BUS Vs IBM TX

  • 1.  IBM Integration BUS Vs IBM TX

    Posted Thu January 12, 2017 09:15 AM

    Originally posted by: GurunathVanka


    Hi All,

     

    I would like to know difference between IBM Integration BUS and IBM Transformation Extender.

    Please let me now if any one know more about this to start conversation

     

    Regards

    Guru


    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange


  • 2.  Re: IBM Integration BUS Vs IBM TX

    Posted Fri January 13, 2017 03:33 AM

    Originally posted by: paul.brett


    At its heart, ITX is a data transformation engine.  Other parts of the product, such as the Launcher, add functionality that duplicate some or all of the functions of other products, such as the routing capabilities of IIB.

    IIB is a mature middleware product and has features not currently found in the ITX Launcher, such as the ability to deploy message flows without having to stop the main flow engine (and other flows).  The mapping engine however, leaves a bit to be desired in terms of usability and functionality though.

    It is for this reason that IIB and ITX make such good partners in most business environments.  Use IIB for enterprise class routing of business data, and use ITX inside IIB (using the ITX node) to simplify your complicated mapping requirements.

    Thank you.

    Paul.

    Follow me on Twitter


    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange