Diego E. KESSELMAN
Original Message:
Sent: Wed September 03, 2025 10:07 AM
From: Assane BA
Subject: IBM i NFS issues
Hello Diego,
We finally created the share on new filesystem separated from root filesystem to avoid permission issues on /var. The option insecure
was added after testing unsuccefully with secure
option
[root@srv-syslog data]# exportfs -v
/data 10.1.0.2(sync,wdelay,hide,no_subtree_check,sec=sys,rw,insecure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash)
The authorities on directories:
[root@srv-syslog data]# pwd
/data
[root@srv-syslog data]# ls -altr
total 102604
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 16384 2 sept. 13:31 lost+found
dr-xr-xr-x. 18 root root 256 2 sept. 13:58 ..
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 104857600 2 sept. 14:08 IMAGE01.ISO
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2 sept. 14:09 VOLUME_LIST
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 167689 2 sept. 14:38 logs
drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 4096 2 sept. 14:40 .
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13665 2 sept. 14:40 log2.txt
[root@srv-syslog data]# ls -altr /
total 32
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 21 juin 2021 srv
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 8 21 juin 2021 sbin -> usr/sbin
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 21 juin 2021 opt
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 21 juin 2021 mnt
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 21 juin 2021 media
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 9 21 juin 2021 lib64 -> usr/lib64
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 7 21 juin 2021 lib -> usr/lib
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 16 21 juin 2021 home
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 7 21 juin 2021 bin -> usr/bin
drwxr-xr-x. 12 root root 144 24 avril 10:46 usr
dr-xr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 25 avril 09:55 boot
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 25 avril 11:04 .autorelabel
dr-xr-xr-x 385 root root 0 3 juil. 02:16 proc
dr-xr-xr-x 13 root root 0 3 juil. 02:16 sys
drwxr-xr-x. 22 root root 4096 25 août 13:21 var
dr-xr-x---. 16 root root 4096 1 sept. 16:17 root
drwxr-xr-x 47 root root 1320 2 sept. 06:09 run
drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 3220 2 sept. 13:31 dev
dr-xr-xr-x. 18 root root 256 2 sept. 13:58 ..
dr-xr-xr-x. 18 root root 256 2 sept. 13:58 .
drwxr-xr-x. 145 root root 8192 2 sept. 14:20 etc
drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 4096 2 sept. 14:40 data
drwxrwxrwt. 9 root root 4096 2 sept. 15:35 tmp
but still having OPT2426 on IBM i side.
------------------------------
Assane BA
Original Message:
Sent: Mon September 01, 2025 02:12 PM
From: Diego KESSELMAN BARRIONUEVO
Subject: IBM i NFS issues
Can you share the PATH to the files, the authorities on the directories and the /etc/exports content from your RedHat?
FYI: In my experience, I do not suggest to use an exported directory under /var file system.
------------------------------
Diego E. KESSELMAN
IBM Champion
ESSELWARE Soluciones
Original Message:
Sent: Mon September 01, 2025 12:54 PM
From: Assane BA
Subject: IBM i NFS issues
Hello Diego,
Thank you for your feedback.
After running the following commands on the Red Hat side:
nfsconf --set nfsd udp y
nfsconf --set nfsd vers3 y
the NFS mount on the IBM i partition now works.
However, I am back to the same error I had with NetBackup when trying to perform a backup or run the wrkimgclge
command on the optical drive (OPT2426 error).
Yet, I was able to create the remote images without any issue.
I believe there must be some permission-related problems that I haven't been able to identify yet.
Here is a view of the file permissions on the Red Hat side:
[root@srv-syslog test]# ls -altr
total 102408
drwxr-xr-x. 22 root root 4096 Aug 25 13:21 ..
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Aug 25 14:19 testTTT
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 104857600 Sep 1 16:34 IMAGE01.ISO
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 59 Sep 1 16:36 .
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Sep 1 16:36 VOLUME_LIST
The firewall service is also stopped:
[root@srv-syslog test]# systemctl status firewalld
● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: inactive (dead) since Mon 2025-08-25 13:49:51 GMT; 1 weeks 0 days ago
Docs: man:firewalld(1)
Process: 1184 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork --nopid $FIREWALLD_ARGS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 1184 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Red Hat version:
[root@srv-syslog test]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.10 (Ootpa)
[root@srv-syslog test]#
On the IBM i side, the error is as follows:
Message ID . . . . . . : OPT2426
Sent date . . . . . . : 01/09/25 Sent time . . . . : 16:30:36
Message . . . . : Not authorized to object. The object is /var/test.
Cause . . . . . :
You do not have the authority for the object /var/test
or for one of the directories in the path to the object.
Recovery . . . :
Contact your security officer, the object owner, or another authorized person to obtain the appropriate authority to use the object /var/test
or the directories in the object path, and then resubmit the request.
If the object name is *N, it is not possible to determine which of the object authorities is insufficient.
Note: Long names may be truncated.
Technical description . . . . . . :
Extended status for the error is 0D1A61A5819961A385A2A34040404040
------------------------------
Assane BA
Original Message:
Sent: Mon September 01, 2025 08:46 AM
From: Diego KESSELMAN BARRIONUEVO
Subject: IBM i NFS issues
Hi Assane,
I have worked with IBM i , NFS and Remote Virtual Image Catalog in different operating systems, and all have their small details.
Remember: IBM i Remote Virtual Image Catalog can only works with NFS v3 and UDP, not TCP or other NFS server versions.
If NetBackup is using NFS server from RedHat we can make it work, but it is important to know the actual RHEL release, because 8.x and 9.x need some adjustments from default values.
* Run these commands:
nfsconf --set nfsd udp y
nfsconf --set nfsd vers3 y
* Enable specific NFS UDP and TCP ports to work properly with FIREWALLD , or just disable the firewall.
* Set the required authorizations on the RH directory, following the guide :
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ibm-i-save-and-restore-using-virtual-optical-images-nfs-server
or this
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ibm-i-backup-your-lpar-nfs-without-using-its-own-diego-kesselman/
* It is important (still don't know why) to use a second level directory, check documents. ie: /NFS/MyBackups/
* Restart the NFS server to take new values
Hope these can help you.
BTW: I don't think this is an efficient way to backup your IBM i. NetBackup will not be able to know media content, so your restore mechanism will be slow, because you need to restore all media set, and complex, because your restore requires some IBM i setup and manual operation.
------------------------------
Diego KESSELMAN BARRIONUEVO
General Manager
ESSELWARE Soluciones, SA de CV
CDMX DIF
+525540408279
Original Message:
Sent: Mon September 01, 2025 07:35 AM
From: Assane BA
Subject: IBM i NFS issues
Hello,
We need to setup IBM i to use remote optical device for backup using NFS of a backup solution called Netbackup via it's feature called Universal Share.
We noticed that the IBMi partition can mount the remote nfs, it can create remote images, volume_list but when we try to backup or run command wrkimgclge this error is sent OPT2426. Which seems related to permissions. we gave all permissions on server side already, but the error is still persisting.
Since this solution is based on Red Hat, we thought of first trying to get the NFS client on IBM i to work from a standard Red Hat server in order to understand what the problem is. However, with this Red Hat server, the NFS mount on the IBM i side doesn't even go through, as error CPDA1B9 is returned. I would like to point out that other Red Hat partitions are able to use NFS servers without any issues, whether from NetBackup or from the standalone Red Hat server.
Has anyone ever encountered this type of problem? Or does anyone have an idea on how to resolve it?
------------------------------
Assane BA
------------------------------