Originally posted by: hanishkola

"販ä¿? -åº?å??å??è³?é??ï¼?ã?®ã??ã??ã?«ã?¿ã?­ã?°ï¼?1 -ï¼·ï½?ï½?ï¼?ï¼­ï½?ï½?ï½?ã?¹ã??ã?¢ã?¼ã?ºã??."

I want the above input to split at interval of each 50 characters

Originally posted by: Tim Rabbitt

Hello:

If you want to split it on input, you can create a type tree with a structure of:

File - defined as a group

   Inputrecord (1:s) - defined as a group

      50chars - defined as text with a min and max character setting of 50

If you want to split it on output, use this as a run map, passing the entire input to this map

I've attached the tree and map as an example

Regards,

Tim Rabbitt

Attachment(s)

50charinput.mtt   5 KB 1 version

50charinput.mms   1 KB 1 version

Originally posted by: hanishkola

Thanks Tim for your reply .

I tried with your type tree and there it is repeating the first 50 characters only again and again .

 My scenario is if there are some 125 characters in input item , it should be spllt in to 50,50,25 to 3 items in out card 

Originally posted by: Tim Rabbitt

Hello:

I've revised the input tree to accept 50 bytes or less.  I used input that had one record in it that contained 50 ones, 50 twos, 50 threes and 25 fours for a total of 175 bytes.  Using the attached map, the output resulted in 4 records.  The first line was the 50 ones, the second was the 50 twos and so on.   My testing was conducted with WTX 8.4.1.2.

Regards,

Tim

Attachment(s)

50charinput.mtt   5 KB 1 version

output.txt   183 B 1 version

50charinput.mms   1 KB 1 version

input.txt   175 B 1 version

Originally posted by: hanishkola

Ok Tim ,

 i got it, actually before  50char Item Min sizewas also 50 , thats why i didn't got output now i changed it to 0 ,and i got now.

Thanks Tim for your help .

Thanks and Regards

Harish 

Originally posted by: Laurent(Satisco)

In 8.4.1.2, you can avoid a RUN map by using the PARSE function, which works fine for "regular" (read "non XML") data. It's not better in terms of performances, but makes less objects to manage and deploy. (We are using PARSE in my current project, so I hope we can have the support working on this XML thing and help improve it)

In earlier versions, it's also feasible to avoid RUN by looping functional map calls, but it can sometimes be a bit clumsy.

Originally posted by: Tim Rabbitt

Hello Laurent:

If you are interested in having WTX add functionality to the product we ask that you submit a Product Enhancement Request.  You can create, search and monitor Product Enhancement Requests at:  https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/?BRAND_ID=343

Regards,

Tim Rabbitt

Originally posted by: thorstenhirsch

Actually I'm already using PARSE on an XML Typetree imported from DTD with Xerces. So I don't think that there's a general problem with PARSE and XML. (WTX 8.4.1.2)

Originally posted by: Laurent(Satisco)

Hi Tim,

I'm aware of the RFE process, and have already submitted some suggestions (and some were even accepted, I like this process as it makes it simpler to get in touch with the labs).

In what I'm describing, there is no need for an RFE, but I had PARSE behave oddly in some cases. I'll try to build a test case and have a PMR open, to get the labs feedback on this.

Best regards

Laurent