IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Hi can anyone tell me the main differences between the WM 46 and IS60 architecture

  • 1.  Hi can anyone tell me the main differences between the WM 46 and IS60 architecture

    Posted Wed March 12, 2003 08:12 PM

    hi, can anyone tell me the main differences between the
    WM4.6 and IS 6.0 architecture.
    thank you


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods-General
    #webMethods
    #webMethods-Architecture


  • 2.  RE: Hi can anyone tell me the main differences between the WM 46 and IS60 architecture

    Posted Wed March 12, 2003 08:13 PM

    The main differnce is IS & ES are tightly coupled with IS
    hosting adapters for both. Both IS & ES development can be
    done with Developer. wM 6.0 adapter have local queues for
    both inbound and outbound.

    Rao Kalvala
    Sr. Principal Architect


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods-General
    #webMethods-Architecture
    #webMethods


  • 3.  RE: Hi can anyone tell me the main differences between the WM 46 and IS60 architecture

    Posted Wed March 12, 2003 08:13 PM

    Hi, rocky.

    There is some good discussion on the board about this. Read
    up on the following link:

    Phil Leary had some great remarks so be sure to stick with
    the whole thread.

    Thanks.

    (Message edited by admin on June 12, 2003)


    #webMethods
    #webMethods-Architecture
    #webMethods-General
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB


  • 4.  RE: Hi can anyone tell me the main differences between the WM 46 and IS60 architecture

    Posted Wed March 12, 2003 08:13 PM

    IS 6.0 architecture is very similar in nature to IS 4.6.
    The adapter architecture changes significantly as mentioned
    in earlier discussions, but the product works very much the
    way it did in version 4.6. I think it’s safe to say that
    the bulk the existing IS functionality remains for the most
    part, unchanged and that most existing IS 4.6 flow and java
    services will run as is in 6.0.

    The easiest way to spot the big changes in IS is to explore
    the new 6.0 version of the IS Developer tool. In addition
    to some handy ease-of-use changes, its functionality has
    been expanded significantly to include the following new
    capabilities:

    • Create and publish Enterprise document types (formerly
      events)
    • Subscribe to Enterprise document types by creating Trigger
      that can invoke a flow service based on the receipt of one
      or more doc types (like the 5.0 Enterprise join adapter) as
      well as the content of those doc types (via filters)
    • Synchronize either a single doc type or all IS server doc
      types created or modified in Developer with a single
      associated broker server
    • Create Adapter Services to define adapter business logic
      (using Flow) for Enterprise adapters developed using the new
      ADK
    • Create an Adapter Notification (and associated doc type)
      that receives a notification from an adapter and publishes
      the specified notification doc type
    • Define Flat File Schemas that describe the structure of a
      flat file, Flat
    • File Dictionaries that hold commonly used flat file
      structures and flat file handling services
    • Define (using the IS Admin tool) new “ports” to poll a
      file system folder for the arrival of a particular file to
      process

    In addition, the Tomcat servlet engine is now embedded in
    the IS product to allow developers to create JSPs (using a
    provided taglib) that invoke flow services (apparently there
    is an underground movement within WM to replace all of the
    existing DSP’s that make up the IS admin tool with JSP’s,
    but I think that will take a release or two to accomplish)

    But my favorite change of all can be best summed up as “ding
    dong, the bridge is dead”. No more kludgy, poor performing
    ES to IS bridge adapters or packages.

    I’m sure that there are several things that I’ve missed, but
    those are ones that come to mind first.

    Mark


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods
    #webMethods-General
    #webMethods-Architecture