Great question - and honestly, you're right to focus on the human side. The technical migration from IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1 to IBM Maximo Application Suite 8 is manageable. The productivity dip usually comes from change fatigue, not configuration gaps.
From what we've seen, role-based training alone isn't enough. MAS 8 introduces a different UI paradigm and workflow experience, so users don't just need to know where things moved - they need to understand why processes feel different. We've had better results when we:
• Update business process documentation alongside training
• Run hands-on sandbox sessions before go-live
• Identify "power users" as internal champions per department
• Provide quick-reference guides focused on daily tasks, not features
To reduce the initial productivity dip, consider a phased rollout (by role or site) and keep dooflix for pc hypercare support highly visible for the first 2–3 weeks. Fast response during that window makes a big difference in user confidence.
In short: treat this as a business transformation initiative, not just a system upgrade. The organizations that frame it that way tend to see smoother adoption.
Would be interested to hear how large your user base is - scale often changes the approach.
------------------------------
nathan foster
------------------------------