Thank you very much Ben. I will take a closer look at the program that errored out to see if it matches this scenario. Very nicely documented in the link you provided.
Hal
------Original Message------
Probably I should elaborate my reply a bit more as we reported this defect and worked the case with support. I remember a similar thought process to yours when dealing with this baffling defect:
1. -245/-144 occurs.
2. Lock mode for the session set to something large or "wait".
3. "All indications are such that this program should *
not* have errorred out with 245/144, yet it did.".
Finding that the locking mechanism does not work is not something you expect since it is fundamental.
If this defect is the cause, it has nothing to do with "onmode -c block", at least not directly.
Ben.
------------------------------
Benjamin Thompson
------------------------------
#Informix