What is the main difference between Broker and Universal Messaging?
Also, I want to know about the differences and methods for UM’s transmission system (ex.Queue, Topic, Data Group …). In particular, with a focus on Data Group.

Check the link;

http://tech.forums.softwareag.com/techjforum/posts/list/52546.page

Thank you so much mahesh for sharing link

It seems that the link is not available any more. Could anyone share a new link?

Hi Felix ,

The link mentioned in this thread is available and I can access as well.

The attached document provides a comparison of features.
Hope this helps.
UM-Broker Comparison.pdf (306 KB)

Felix, yes you were right (even I got some error!) but now if you retry now it must take you there.

Thanks Jonathan , for sharing the document.

Hey Rankesh / Jonathan,

I’m just confused about the terminology used in the document shared by Jonathan.

NUMWI &
NUMWS

NUMWF &
NUMTF

what do they mean.

Thanks,
Arun Cholleti.

Hi Arun,

Those are different product codes of UM licenses…

NUMWI - With this you can expect similar behaviour as in Broker and it doesn’t support Active-Active clustering. If users are using Broker then can get a free swap to this UM license which means no extra cost involved in migrating to UM.

NUMWS - Apart from the features provided by NUMWI, this also supports Active-Active clustering.

NUMWF - Fully featured license. This supports additional features like AMQP, MQTT, JavaScript and mobile support. Additionally it also supports Data Groups, web proxies, schedulers etc…

NUMTF- Fully featured Terracotta license. This should be used if we are using UM as standalone and not being used for messaging within webMethods products.

Hope it helps !!

Regards,
Ashok

Ashok,

Thanks for responding.

Many thanks for the information.

Arun Cholleti

Thanks a lot for the document.

Ashok,

Thanks for the response.

How do find out what of the above features do we have to 9.12 trial version for UM

Thanks,
Arun Cholleti.