This might be a stupid question but I have tried everything I can come up with and searched for answers everywhere, so I hope that maybe I can get some help here.
I'm at the end of my BA in forensic psychology and have contstructed a pilot study to check if my survey and measuring instruments will work for my final study.
The important questions are supposed to measure how trustworthy people think that people with downs syndrome is when giving a statement after being a victim of a crime.
In this pilot study I have two questions to measure trustworthiness, and to me it seems obvious that they are measuring the same thing.
Roughly translated to english they are:
H
ow trustworthy do you feel Anna was when she claimed her cash that was stolen?Not trustworthy at all Completely trustworthy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
How trustworthy do you feel Anna was when she claimed her necklace was stolen?Not trustworthy at all Completely trustworthy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
However a reliability test shows an Cronbach's alfa of ,289
There's 20 respondats in the pilot study, half was given the information that Anna has downs syndrome and the other half didn't.
------------------------------
zanno Jacklin
------------------------------
#SPSSStatistics