IBM FlashSystem

IBM FlashSystem

Find answers and share expertise on IBM FlashSystem

 View Only
  • 1.  Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Mon March 27, 2023 09:17 AM

    Hi, We have two standard v5200 storage already in production. We using host based mirroring on the Solaris server for data redundancy.

    We will connect in the future new ESXi servers to the SAN and will want to use hyperswap for datastore redundancy (no host based mirroring possible).

    The 2 Flash are in 2 differents rooms interconnected by fibers on SAN switches, that we'll partition using virtual fabric to support the Hyperswap configuration.

    what's the best way to migrate from non hyperswap to hyperswap config without any downtime, a least on storage1, and also without losing all previous volume on storage2 if possible to minimize host based mirroring synchronization for Solaris system.

     



    ------------------------------
    Stephane Nsakala
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Tue March 28, 2023 02:33 AM

    Should be not too difficult to do :

    • define dedicated fiber ports on V5200 for replication traffic
    • set correct portmask to dedicate those ports for replication traffic only (chsystem -localfcportmask xxxxxxxxx)
    • SAN zoning between the ports listed above (use the physical WWN's) - should be in dedicated VF
    • Now you should be able to change the topology to hyperswap
    • Once in hyperswap, you should create "ip quorum" that should sit in a 3rd location. IP quorum is a .jar file that can run on different platforms (java)

    All this should be online and existing (non-replicated) volumes will stay accessible all the time



    ------------------------------
    Hans Populaire
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Tue March 28, 2023 02:51 AM

    I'd like to amend this:

    • FS5200_2 needs to be freed, that is the cluster config existing on that one will be entirely cleared, so both node canisters are in status CANDIDATE
    • now the previous FS5002_2 can be added as additional control enclosure to the existing FS5200_1, see IBM Docs "Adding a control enclosure to an existing system"
    • configure sites ids for the two control enclosures
    • set up an IP quorum in a third site; it only should be set up to store metadata, if network bandwidth and/or disk throughput are sufficient
    • now change topology to hyperswap


    ------------------------------
    Christian Schroeder
    IBM SpecV Storage Support with Passion
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Tue March 28, 2023 03:22 AM

    Thanks. If i understand well. there is no way to keep the volume on the second storage (FS5200_2). From the docs: "Do not start this procedure unless you are certain that you want to remove all the volume and configuration data from this system".

    I will need to recreate the volumes for host based morring (Solaris server will not use hyperswap volumes) and the mirror will take some time (couple of days, depending on the size).



    ------------------------------
    Stephane Nsakala
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Tue March 28, 2023 03:26 AM

    Is this procedure is the same as running 'leavecluster -force'  on both V5200_2 storage nodes ?



    ------------------------------
    Stephane Nsakala
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Wed March 29, 2023 06:52 AM

    Additional you need to reset the clusterID on the enclosure you want to free up.



    ------------------------------
    Bernd Albrecht
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Thu March 30, 2023 05:24 AM

    Thanks Hans. What do you mead when you talk about 'physical WWN's'?  do you speak about PHYSICAL vs NPIV port ?



    ------------------------------
    Stephane Nsakala
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Tue March 28, 2023 04:06 AM

    Hello,

    i've done this procedure some time ago, unfortunately, it is not possible to merge two existing clusters into a hyperswap, but you have to remove all data from one of the systems, after which you destroy the cluster with the command: satask leavecluster -force 
    Once the cluster is destroyed, you will see the nodes in the service state with code 690 (node in service state). From the drop-down menu you can get the canisters out of the service state, or you can do the same via the command: satask stopservice
    in this way the nodes will enter the 'Candidate' state. Nodes in candidate can be added to an existing cluster as a new group I/O, and from there you can switch to the hyperswap topology and create hyperswap volumes.



    ------------------------------
    Davide Galbussera
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Configuring hyperswap on already production system

    Posted Tue March 28, 2023 04:08 AM

    Not sure what your requirements are. Depending on your requirements you may not need to use hyperswap.

    Instead of hyperswap, you could configure storage replication between the 2 V5200 (GM or MM) to replicate datastores between 2 storage frames.

    In this case you can keep the 2 V5200 systems as they are today.

    Only difference from user point of view is that this will be active/passive replication.



    ------------------------------
    Hans Populaire
    ------------------------------