IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

checkUser ABORTED

  • 1.  checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Mon July 18, 2011 09:40 PM

    The Problem is when the partner submit using wm.tn:receive

    When they submit the document, the document is recognizing and posting in the trading network successfully. But the processing status is changing to “ABORTED” and the error is : The user that posted this document (Default) could not be associated with a partner to check their identity.

    In the activity log, the user is “default”

    The customer is posting thru https,

    Created User on TNPartner group and provided username and passwrd to customer…

    No certificates.


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods
    #B2B-Integration


  • 2.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Mon July 18, 2011 09:49 PM

    It will show as Default user only…By default tn:receive wont allow access directly unless it is changed to Anonymous.

    check this thread also:
    [url]https://advantage.webmethods.com/advantage?targChanId=kb_home&oid=1611780104[/url]

    HTH,
    RMG


    #webMethods
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #B2B-Integration


  • 3.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Mon July 18, 2011 10:04 PM

    Thanks for the reply.

    Will check it and let u know.

    thanks,


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #B2B-Integration
    #webMethods


  • 4.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Tue July 19, 2011 07:40 PM

    Hi rmg,

    i am not supposed to change ACL to anonymous as tn.receive service is protected and nobody cannot directly post data to our server…

    can u suggest me anything else


    #webMethods
    #B2B-Integration
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB


  • 5.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Tue July 19, 2011 08:02 PM

    Yes…Did you look that thread also?

    Increase the log level (DEBUG) as well proxy side and are you seeing any errors while TP connecting?

    What is your IS/TN version?

    HTH,
    RMG


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods
    #B2B-Integration


  • 6.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Tue July 19, 2011 09:47 PM

    Don’t let outside systems post directly to tn:receive. Create a gateway service. Refer to [URL]wmusers.com for additional detail.


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #B2B-Integration
    #webMethods


  • 7.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Tue July 19, 2011 09:51 PM

    Yes I agree…Or else have a IS Proxy (Reverse Gateway setup) with http/s and have them connect to tn:receive gateway in your Integration landscape:

    HTH,
    RMG


    #webMethods
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #B2B-Integration


  • 8.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Wed July 20, 2011 03:18 PM

    we developed a generic service for receive, like

    XXX.tn:receiveData.

    which includes wm.tn.recognize,xxx.tn.submit. The xxx.tn.submit, replicates wm.tn.submit, where we disabled checkUser.

    i think it is not right process to do as we are letting any customer to post the data and we are not checking for the user.

    when i decompiled the java code for the tn.doc:checkUser

    it checks for :

    User u_me = s_me.getUser();
    /* 1435 / if (u_me == null) {
    /
    1436 */ throw new ServiceException(SystemLog2.clientFormat(3, 1031));

    where is getuser in the WmTN package, i dont see it.

    How is getuser works

    package version: 7.1.2.0.118

    IS 7.1.3

    Do we have any fix for it?


    #B2B-Integration
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods


  • 9.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Wed July 20, 2011 03:40 PM

    You shouldn’t be compiling any webMethods built in service comes with standard install…

    I know IS713/TN712 has issues with checkUser and should be some fix associated …So either disable this service per that article or open incident/ticket with SAG support that can resolve in a better way:

    HTH,
    RMG


    #webMethods
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #B2B-Integration


  • 10.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Wed July 20, 2011 04:21 PM

    Ok. thankyou.

    If possible can u letme know some details about fix and i can raise a ticket for SAG support.


    #webMethods
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #B2B-Integration


  • 11.  RE: checkUser ABORTED

    Posted Wed July 20, 2011 05:12 PM

    No fix details on top of my head…you can raise a ticket:


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods
    #B2B-Integration