I will offer you these quotes from some people knowledgeable about MANOVA.
Bruce Weaver I like that advice. My own observations suggest that more often than not,
people use MANOVA as a precursor to multiple ANOVAs. They seem to believe
that a significant MANOVA buys protection against Type I error in the
subsequent ANOVAs in the same way that a significant omnibus F-test buys
protection for the subsequent t-tests when one uses Fisher's LSD (with 3
groups). But as Huberty & Morris clearly say, it just ain't so! For them,
it boils down to this: If you have a multivariate question, use MANOVA; but
if you have a series of univariate questions, use a series of ANOVAs. (In
the latter case, you might consider some kind of adjustment for
multiplicity--but that's another can of worms!)
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ee6c/77c99c8e4530d0cccaedf85ed525fb22a02d.pdf
Rich Ulrich wrote
> As an expert in Manova, my advice has always been,
> "Avoid it when you can."
#SPSSStatistics#Support#SupportMigration