IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

Asynch Table: Database Connector Vs JDBC code

  • 1.  Asynch Table: Database Connector Vs JDBC code

    Posted Tue November 27, 2007 02:03 PM

    Hi,

    I observed two popular approaches to work with database using myWebmethods 7.0

    a) The built-in Database Connector

    b) The java JDBC code that uses ISqlWorker and jdbc classes.

    Option a) seems to be good and generic for results from a SELECT queries

    Option b) seems to work well when we have to collect information from user esp in UPDATE/DELETE/INSERT actions and the user submits a form with lot of inputs. I can use this option for SELECT queries aswell.

    My question now is: w.r.t Asynch tables? which one is more optimized.


    #MWS-CAF-Task-Engine
    #webMethods-BPMS
    #webMethods


  • 2.  RE: Asynch Table: Database Connector Vs JDBC code

    Posted Tue November 27, 2007 06:13 PM

    I would recommend using the Database connector for as many situations as you can.


    #webMethods-BPMS
    #MWS-CAF-Task-Engine
    #webMethods


Related Content