Originally posted by: SystemAdmin
Jan,
in my client's current architecture we are using an XML structure as a Common Data Model between all TX interfaces.
This XML structure is imported and then we "cut out" the sections we require a form a separate tree that is actually used in the maps. Therefore we have 2 XML trees -- a "Master" and a "Section" so to say.
I re-imported the "Master" in 7.5. Then I opened the existing "Section" in 7.5 (I did not re-import or re-cut it). I tried to merge the two, which caused problems due to the different manner in which terminators are handled.
Therefore it became essential for us to re-import our XML structures.
Personally I would recommend re-importing your trees. Of course, you'll have to look at your cost/benefit ratio to see whether this is worthwhile. If you have maps already ini production then it is probably worth leaving them until a change becomes necessary.
I found Ascential Support (UK) to be very helpful on this topic.
We're now upgrading to 7.5.1 to resolve a memory leak issue on our Windows server.
#DataExchange#IBMSterlingTransformationExtender#IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender