IBM Sterling Transformation Extender

Sterling Transformation Extender

Come for answers, stay for best practices. All we're missing is you.


#Sterling
#Supplychain
 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

8.1 vs 8.2

  • 1.  8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/17/09 09:16 AM

    Originally posted by: Yusuf@BOE


    We are considering which version of TX to upgrade to (from 8.0 on HP-UX).

    What do you use and why?
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange


  • 2.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/17/09 12:15 PM

    Originally posted by: Daniel_MK


    We went 8.1, 8.2 wasn't ready for prime time 9 months ago when we made the decision. Maybe its better now i don't know.
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange


  • 3.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/18/09 12:46 PM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    8.2 introduced the Eclipse user interface for the Map & Type Designers. There is a non-trivial learning curve to come up to speed. If you are change-adverse, you will want to move to 8.1. You can find a tutorial on using the Eclipse interface if you search this forum or the IBM WTX site. I can't find it at the moment. Contact NancyR on this forum for the link.

    The 8.2 releases work fine. 8.2.0.4 is the latest.
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 4.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2



  • 5.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 09/01/09 05:17 PM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    There is a basic tutorial for the Eclipse Workbench available in Help.
    1. Open the IBM Websphere Transformation Extender Design Studio.
    2. Select 'Help Contents' from the Help menu.
    3. Click on 'Workbench User Guide'.
    4. Expand 'Getting started'.
    5. Click on 'Basic tutorial'.
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #DataExchange


  • 6.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/19/09 08:35 AM

    Originally posted by: Yusuf@BOE


    I'm not change-averse, more change-afraid.

    The number of issues encountered when upgrading in the past would lead me to naturally go for the version with the greatest stability, unless the latest version supplies some sort of particular benefit. (Something like support of a later Oracle or MQ version for example)
    #DataExchange
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 7.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/19/09 11:27 AM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    I don't know how you measure stability. Last year when I first used 8.2.0.3, every time I found a bug/missing feature, IBM provided a patch quickly and these were for issues where there was an easy workaround. I didn't experience any significant problems.

    You may want to review the What's New? PDFs to see if there are features you really want. I for one like the ability to use XSD files instead of creating XML type trees. As a consultant, I like to know the latest releases so that is my personal bias.

    Good luck.
    #DataExchange
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 8.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/19/09 11:33 AM

    Originally posted by: Daniel_MK


    It was the original 8.2 (before even the fixpack) that we tried, so its better now i'm sure. That original 8.2 certainly wasn't of usable quality.
    #DataExchange
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 9.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/20/09 11:12 AM

    Originally posted by: Yusuf@BOE


    That's what worries me, the first version unusable, and even the third version has bugs and missing features. I'd like to use it, but don't fancy doing IBM's beta testing (again).
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender


  • 10.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/23/09 04:51 PM

    Originally posted by: ChB


    Hello Yusuf,

    have you installed both versions to see a difference?

    I personaly had always problems installing the Design Studio, if other packages are added.

    With 8.2.0.3 I was not able to start the Eclipse after installing the SNMP package, with 8.2.0.4 I'm still not able to start Eclipse after installing the API. :-( IBM was not able to recreate the issue, but we got some patches which worked more or less.

    I don't like to see Java-Exception-Errors when developing Maps, so my preferred solution is 8.1, which is making a faster and more satble impression.

    I don't have more problems with the launcher version 8.2 than with version 8.1.x

    But my experience is just private nature, none of my customers have 8.2 in a production environment.

    Best regards

    Christian
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender


  • 11.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/24/09 02:10 PM

    Originally posted by: snutakki


    A friend of mine worked on 8.2 and said it takes very long time to compile a map or analyze a type tree ( the exact words he said are 'we can click analyze for a tree and then go take a 10-15minute recess' ).

    thanks,
    cai
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender


  • 12.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/24/09 04:07 PM

    Originally posted by: SystemAdmin


    I have used WTX 8.2.0.3 on three ordinary laptops at least five years old and have not experienced long analysis or build times. This included some rather complex HIPAA maps and type trees.
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender


  • 13.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/24/09 04:10 PM

    Originally posted by: snutakki


    That's good to know that you did not have any issues with it.
    I was wondering if anyone else had similar issues during compile or build time.

    thanks,
    cai
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender


  • 14.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/25/09 05:27 AM

    Originally posted by: thorstenhirsch


    We had no issues with compile or build time on wtx 8.2.0.4.

    Thorsten
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange


  • 15.  Re: 8.1 vs 8.2

    Posted 03/25/09 03:33 PM

    Originally posted by: jvanboga


    I have not tried the most recent version of 8.2. I had tried the initial releases. I was very interested in this release but was less than enchanted.

    Unlike Jim I've been disappointed with the reponse times. It takes (conservatively) twice as long to load simple maps and trees via the eclypse interface. I guess builds weren't that bad but just opening a map or tree should not take as long as it does. The complex HIPAA maps here don't take longer to compile but do take longer to load.

    Also did not like that IBM decoupled one of the core components of the design studio, 'Command Server'. We have a number of non-TX systems that execute maps as part of their processes. The Command Server is a somewhat critical and basic part of the Design Studio.
    #IBMSterlingTransformationExtender
    #IBM-Websphere-Transformation-Extender
    #DataExchange