Let us stop treating encryption like a checkbox - and start treating it like the bedrock of data security.
If you have been in any tech conversation lately, from zero trust to AI agents to quantum-safe cryptography, chances are you have heard a lot about the new. New attack vectors, new compliance mandates, new architectures. And yet, the one thing that does not get nearly enough attention is the one that should: encryption.
Somehow, encryption has become the quiet, reliable background character in the security story - assumed, overlooked, or even dismissed as “already solved.” But here is the truth: encryption is not just a security layer. It is the foundation everything else depends on.
"Isn't that already handled?"
Ask around, and you will probably hear one of these:
-
“Oh yeah, our cloud provider encrypts everything.”
-
“That is already part of the platform, right?”
-
“We passed the audit - we are good.”
But here is the thing: encryption is not a feature box to check. It is not a configuration setting you enable once and forget. And it is definitely not “done” just because the database is encrypted at rest.
Encryption actually transforms the data
This is the part that should be talked about more.
A lot of security tools work around the data. Access controls. Threat monitoring. Identity systems. All important, but they do not actually touch the data itself.
Encryption changes the data.
It turns it into something useless to anyone who does not have the key. Even if someone breaks in. Even if they exfiltrate the files. Even if they copy the database.
And when paired with good key management, it becomes one of the very few controls that holds up even when everything else fails.
So why do we not talk about it more?
Let us be honest. Encryption does not trend like AI or quantum. It is not "cool" in the same way that agentic architectures or zero trust edge networks are. And because it is often handled deep in the infrastructure, people assume it is already taken care of.
But here is the danger in that mindset:
-
It is seen as a checkbox - not a core design choice
-
It is treated as a compliance item - not a strategic enabler
-
It is considered solved - until something breaks
And when something does break, like a leaked key, an expired certificate, an unencrypted data store, or a misconfigured policy, that is when encryption suddenly becomes everyone's problem.
Here is what is becoming clear:
-
Encryption is the capability. All these new trends like AI, quantum, policy automation are just helping us scale and evolve how we implement it.
-
Key management does not scale automatically. As your data grows, the complexity of managing keys, secrets, and certificates grows right alongside it.
-
Security architecture needs to grow with technology. If encryption is not baked in from the beginning, it is really hard to bolt on later.
What is at stake when we get it wrong?
This is not theoretical - we have all seen the headlines and the postmortems:
Each of these is usually avoidable if encryption and key management are treated as first-class design decisions.
A small shift in how we think
So here is the ask:
The next time you are in a product design meeting, an architecture review, or even just thinking through a new idea…
Ask yourself:
-
How are we encrypting this data?
-
Where are the keys? Who owns them?
-
Is encryption part of the foundation - or just a patch on top?
Because the more tech evolves, the more important that foundation becomes.
And it is time we give encryption the spotlight it quietly deserves.