we have AI agents for almost every task that was cumbersome and time-consuming previously for humans. For automation testing, these agents work on generative AI, NLP, Vision AI, and AI context. They allow you to write or generate test cases in plain English quickly, and also have self-healing capabilities.
In this article, we will discuss how intelligent AI agents and Gen AI are changing the way software testing is being carried out today.
AI Agents in Software Testing
AI agents are autonomous entities that use machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), AI context, and reasoning algorithms. These agents automate, optimize, and improve the software testing process. They go beyond traditional test automation tools by adapting to changes. They learn from data, make decisions, and even generate new test scenarios without human intervention. They help you test the AI of apps with their generative AI capabilities.
Here is an example of how important AI agents are in the current scenario: CrewAI, which is a virtual staffing agency for AI, and IBM’s watsonx platform can be integrated to create a sophisticated system for financial analysis. Read on: Leveraging CrewAI and IBM watsonx - IBM Developer.
Let us review a few important tasks that AI agents in software testing can carry out with ease:
-
Generate Tests: You can create test cases automatically from requirements, user stories, or product descriptions using generative AI.
-
Execute Tests: Perform test steps like clicking buttons, reading graphs, entering text, verifying UI content, filling-in forms, or calling APIs—just like a human tester would.
-
Maintenance and Self-healing: You can update or repair broken tests using self-healing. It helps to detect and adapt to UI or logic changes.
-
Detect Defect & Root Cause Analysis (RCA): Analyze logs, screenshots, and past behaviors to detect anomalies and identify likely sources of failure.
-
Exploratory Testing: Simulate real-user interactions and explore new paths in the application to uncover edge cases.
Features of AI Agents
-
Autonomous Functionality: AI agents can function with minimal human input. They interpret instructions, navigate applications, and validate outputs automatically.
-
Adaptable to Changes: They adapt to UI or functional changes in the application under test (AUT). They use techniques like self-healing locators, reducing test flakiness, and maintenance effort.
-
Learning and Improvement: AI agents learn from historical test results, user behavior, or production data to predict failure points, prioritize test cases, or suggest improvements.
-
Understands NLP: Many modern agents understand plain English input, enabling non-technical team members to create and update test cases.
-
Makes Decisions: They can make contextual decisions, such as identifying whether a failed test is due to a real bug, an environment issue, or expected behavior after a recent change.
Generative AI in Software Testing
What makes AI agents in software testing powerful is their accessibility—any team member, whether a manual tester, product manager, or business analyst, can contribute to test creation using plain English. You can either write simple natural language commands or ask these agents to generate test scripts automatically based on the app or feature/requirement description. This provides better collaboration, faster test automation, and shared understanding across teams.
What are Self-healing Test Scripts?
The most annoying challenge for automation engineers in test automation is test script flakiness. These tests fail not because of actual bugs but because of fragile dependencies on the app's implementation details. Here, the self-healing capabilities of AI agents are truly required to save time, effort, and costs. This is more relevant in Agile and DevOps environments.
With AI agents, tests are executed just as a human would understand the plain English-language specifications. The system does not rely on brittle selectors like XPath or CSS locators. If a UI element, such as “Add to Cart” button changes in position, color, or other attributes, then the tool’s advanced AI can still accurately locate it and perform the required action.
And, this self-healing capability is even much more powerful. In cases of significant UI or requirement changes, such as the “Add to Cart” button being renamed to “Add to Basket”. Then generative AI intelligently analyzes the change. It determines whether this is a genuine bug or simply a valid UI update. After this, it then automatically adapts the test behavior accordingly.
By doing so, the tool reduces the need for constant test maintenance, and helps you in saving engineering time and effort. Also, it equips teams to scale automation with confidence, even in dynamic development environments.
Shift-left and Test Early
With AI agents, you can create test cases in plain English, even before the engineering team begins development. This early shift-left of the testing process brings in stronger collaboration within the team. This allows teams to clarify specifications early-on and have understanding even before the app’s code is written by developers.
As a result, teams significantly reduce the risk of miscommunication and rework during development. This process leads to an average 35% reduction in engineering time. In the context of software development environments, this translates into substantial time and cost savings.
These advanced agents fully support Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) and Specification-Driven Development (SDD) with gen AI. They remove the need for complex programming skills. Traditional BDD tools still require technical setup, coding, and manual effort. On the other hand, these agents handle all this heavy lifting, automatically transforming natural language scenarios into fully functional automated tests. You get all this, and luckily – no coding required.
Test LLMs and Chatbots
testRigor is an intelligent AI agent that sets itself apart through three major innovations: generative AI-powered test creation, drastically reduced test maintenance, and robust self-healing capabilities. Regarding maintenance, testRigor offers a 99.5% reduction in test upkeep thanks to its AI-driven self-healing engine. Unlike traditional tools that rely on brittle locators or code-level identifiers, it intelligently identifies UI elements using visual and contextual cues, just like a human would.
Designed as a true human emulator, testRigor supports testing across web, mobile (native and hybrid), desktop, API, mainframe, and database layers. Its Gen AI engine interprets free-form natural language and converts it into executable steps, offering a frictionless automation experience.
These AI agents do not just automate—they learn, adapt, and make decisions. They are equipped to test modern AI systems, including LLMs, chatbots, user intent handling, sentiment polarity (positive/negative), and true/false scenarios. For instance, testRigor can validate prompt injection vulnerabilities in chatbots using its built-in AI capabilities, bridging the gap between traditional automation and AI-first applications.
AI and the Future of Test Automation
The traditional role of QA is evolving. It is no longer centered around manual scripting or repetitive tasks. We have moved beyond basic autocomplete and test templates. Today, AI can generate fully functional end-to-end test cases directly from app descriptions or feature specs.
As Artem Golubev, Founder and CEO of testRigor, notes, this shift marks a new reality: the role of QA is changing, and increasingly, software engineers are transitioning to reviewing and validating what AI creates and executes. This is definitely a profound change in how teams approach quality and development.
Given the critical need for scalability in modern enterprises, these AI agents are purpose-built to scale. They offer a robust feature set for enterprise use, including SSO support for both testing and platform access and the flexibility to run in on-premise environments. They are a powerful choice for large organizations looking to adopt AI-driven testing.
Can AI Fully Replace Manual Testing?
Well, this is a tricky question. It might or might not fully replace manual testing. The reason is that we need manual validations as well while testing, no matter how much automation we have achieved. The examples are UX, exploratory testing, edge cases, etc. Also, with LLMs and chatbots, human intuition and judgment are required in testing more than ever, especially for adversarial testing. However, in the coming years, it will probably take over the vast majority of the tests, though it is tough to say about the timeline yet.
#watsonx.ai