IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only
  • 1.  UM Subscription Filter

    Posted Thu March 25, 2021 06:43 AM

    We are trying to use the same UM realm with different Integration Server.

    IS 1 Publish - IS 3 Subscribe
    IS 2 Publish - IS 4 Subscribe

    On both IS we have the same document but we want the subscription to be in different IS according to the IS that publishes the document,

    What is the best approach using UM ?

    With the Broker we had one broker server with two different Brokers.

    Thanks

    Joao


    #Universal-Messaging-Broker
    #webMethods


  • 2.  RE: UM Subscription Filter

    Posted Fri March 26, 2021 02:09 AM

    Hi,

    What is the end use case here ?

    Regards,
    Piyush


    #webMethods
    #Universal-Messaging-Broker


  • 3.  RE: UM Subscription Filter

    Posted Fri March 26, 2021 05:40 AM

    We would like to share the same UM with the IS of development and test environment.

    Dev Publisher IS → Dev Subscriber IS (UM 1)
    Test Publisher IS → Test Subscriber IS (UM 1)


    #Universal-Messaging-Broker
    #webMethods


  • 4.  RE: UM Subscription Filter

    Posted Fri March 26, 2021 11:11 AM

    Out of curiosity, why? I don’t think UM has the same notion of a “managing server” (Broker Server) with independent messaging instance (Broker). In effect, the prior setup you had were 2 independent messaging instances. The IS instances connected to one or the other. Is there a constraint for spinning up a separate UM instance for test?


    #Universal-Messaging-Broker
    #webMethods


  • 5.  RE: UM Subscription Filter

    Posted Fri March 26, 2021 11:16 AM

    We now have a UM with Active / Passive cluster.

    We don’t want to have two Active / Passive clusters. We only want to have one infraestructure of UM for Dev and Tests.


    #Universal-Messaging-Broker
    #webMethods


  • 6.  RE: UM Subscription Filter

    Posted Fri March 26, 2021 11:44 AM

    In dev you have active/passive? Hmm. I get using active/passive in test to mimic what is in prod. But for dev, seems excessive?

    Did you have active/passive with Broker Server in dev?

    In any case, I do not know how to get a single UM instance to support independent “message networks” the way Broker Server does with Broker. Perhaps someone else has an approach – would be interested to hear what it might be. Given that IS publishing and subscribing is all based upon document type, unless there is a way at the IS level to segregate published docs there may not be an approach with a single UM. Client prefix comes to mind but I don’t think that segregates things – just helps with publish order and subscriber “clustering”.


    #Universal-Messaging-Broker
    #webMethods


  • 7.  RE: UM Subscription Filter

    Posted Mon May 17, 2021 07:04 PM

    If your IS subscriptions have different names between Dev and Test, you can try the DurableNameFiltering option under DurableConfig in UM. It should allow you to designate each message to a particular subscriber. In order to enable it when you publish from IS there was something you need to set… subject name, or something similar.

    Cheers,
    Stefan


    #webMethods
    #Universal-Messaging-Broker