Hi,
I am implementing RosettaNet PIP3B2 V11.00 with partner.
I have a question about namespace issue in service content, can you let me know which one is correct?
Thanks.

format 1:
<AdvanceShipmentNotification
xmlns=“urn:rosettanet:specification:interchange:AdvanceShipmentNotification:xsd:schema:02.01”
xmlns:tns=“urn:rosettanet:specification:interchange:AdvanceShipmentNotification:xsd:schema:02.01”
xmlns:da=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Manufacturing:Axis:xsd:codelist:01.03”
xmlns:dacc=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Procurement:AccountClassification:xsd:codelist:01.03”
xmlns:dad=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Manufacturing:AttachmentDescription:xsd:codelist:01.03”
xmlns:dbpq=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Procurement:BookPriceQualifier:xsd:codelist:01.04”
:
:
:


upi:SpecifiedFullPartner
uci:ContactInformation
uci:ContactString</uci:Contact>
uci:EmailString</uci:Email>
uci:FaxString</uci:Fax>
:
:
:

upi:SpecifiedFullPartner
uci:ContactInformation
uci:ContactString</uci:Contact>
:
:
:

ssdh:DocumentHeader
ssdh:CorrelationInformation
ssdh:ContractInformation
ssdh:ContractIdentifierString</ssdh:ContractIdentifier>
ssdh:ContractTypeString</ssdh:ContractType>
:
:
:

Format 2:

<tns:AdvanceShipmentNotification
xmlns=“urn:rosettanet:specification:interchange:AdvanceShipmentNotification:xsd:schema:02.01”
xmlns:da=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Manufacturing:Axis:xsd:codelist:01.03”
xmlns:dacc=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Procurement:AccountClassification:xsd:codelist:01.03”
xmlns:dad=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Manufacturing:AttachmentDescription:xsd:codelist:01.03”
xmlns:dbpq=“urn:rosettanet:specification:domain:Procurement:BookPriceQualifier:xsd:codelist:01.04”
:
:
:
tns:AdvanceShipment
tns:PurchasedBy
upi:SpecifiedFullPartner
uci:ContactInformation
uci:ContactString</uci:Contact>
uci:EmailString</uci:Email>
uci:FaxString</uci:Fax>
:
:
:
tns:ShipFrom
upi:SpecifiedFullPartner
uci:ContactInformation
uci:ContactString</uci:Contact>
:
:
:

ssdh:DocumentHeader
ssdh:CorrelationInformation
ssdh:ContractInformation
ssdh:ContractIdentifierString</ssdh:ContractIdentifier>
ssdh:ContractTypeString</ssdh:ContractType>
:
:
:

Hi Julian,

Both formats are correct. IMHO, stick with first one.

HTH.

Thanks,
Rankesh

Hi Rankesh,
Thanks for your help.