IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration

Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Performance tuning for Integrator Server

  • 1.  Performance tuning for Integrator Server

    Posted Thu June 27, 2002 04:21 AM

    I’ve just read the WM IS46 Performance & Scalability Report, and have a little question which was unanswered by the paper. WM benchmarked Sun’s JDK vs. IBM’s, but they did not mention which of the two JIT compilers (“client” or “server”) they have chosen on the Sun JDK. I’m assuming it is the “server” VM that WM have used, since otherwise additional CPU scalability is zero (in my experience) if the “client” VM is used. Anybody knows?


    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods
    #webMethods-General


  • 2.  RE: Performance tuning for Integrator Server

    Posted Thu June 27, 2002 08:42 AM

    I use the -server switch in the script startup.

    There is a line in the server.sh/bat file that resembles this:

    set JAVA_RUN=%JAVA_EXE% %JAVA_MEMSET%

    I set the switch:

    set JAVA_RUN=%JAVA_EXE% -server %JAVA_MEMSET%


    #webMethods-General
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods


  • 3.  RE: Performance tuning for Integrator Server

    Posted Fri June 28, 2002 09:41 AM

    We tried both switches at various points in time though the tests for the whitepaper were done with the default since empirically the results were slightly better (strange but true, at least in our lab).

    If running on a Windows OS, the IBM JVM always was the better choice. Sun 1.3.x was better than 1.2.2 but it never got into the same performance level as the IBM JVM.


    #webMethods-General
    #Integration-Server-and-ESB
    #webMethods