thanks Eric,
that’s what I was thinking about before. I was looking for a more simple solution, because if I had 50 fields in the record I would have to use 50 transformers.
I used the next method:
- I created a new record with the same structure as the source one
- I assigned ‘*’ to all the fields
- I mapped the source record to this new one
As the result, I have the new record with the same structure and ‘*’ for the empty fields.
Question: maybe someone can tell me if there is another way to keep the same record structure if in run-time there are empty fields.
#webMethods#Flow-and-Java-services#Integration-Server-and-ESB