Join this online group to communicate across IBM product users and experts by sharing advice and best practices with peers and staying up to date regarding product enhancements.
[
Being the Product Manager of, and having worked with webMethods.io Integration since its launch, I’ve developed many complex integrations internally at Software AG to automate application processes, as well as working with our customers, Professional Servcices and Partners to help them in their cloud journeys. Along the way I’ve amassed considerable knowledge as to what works well, what doesn’t, and where users and developers of the platform can find themselves at a junction, not knowing which direction to approach or which way to turn in order to reach their goal.
Today, I’d like to share with you my first attempt at creating a set of community guidelines for developers of webMethods.io Integration based on these experiences.
https://github.com/SoftwareAG/webmethods-io-integration-guidelines/
Copy
Thanks for sharing your knowledge about software integration!
We offer No-code, workflow Low -code, Flow Service Code - connectors/custom actions
We’ve had this categorization for quite some time.
Yes thats a direct link, but I Linked to the start as I plan to add more guides… this one is just the ‘developer’ focused one.
There’s no continuous document. I started as one, but it was too difficult to maintain, hence I broke it down.
Nosy me would like to know:
Dave you write in the guide!
webMethods.io Integration currently provides two different approaches for developing integrations No-code Workflow Automations Low-code FlowServices Integrations
webMethods.io Integration currently provides two different approaches for developing integrations
No/Low-Code are hot topics right now in conjunction with citizen developer/power user, … When did webMethods make this categorization for the first time?
@Dave_Pemberton isn’t this the direct link to the guide? webmethods-io-integration-guidelines Or at least from this link you can start reading right away.
Side question. Is it possible to view the guide as a continuous document? I couldn’t figure it out.
Correct Mark - Wayne gave a thorough review and corrected many of my typos, and cleaned it up Thank you @wayne.leishman.20059.
I just love that we are able to suggest improvements and these have a good chance to become the gospel Dave I hear that one improvement made it into the guidelines already. Is that true?
Update: Link to the first merged pull request by @wayne.leishman.20059
Many thanks @Dave_Pemberton, an excellent guide to start with.