IBM FlashSystem

IBM FlashSystem

Find answers and share expertise on IBM FlashSystem

 View Only

IBM Launches new Storage Solutions October 2010

By Tony Pearson posted Thu October 07, 2010 02:03 AM

  

Originally posted by: TonyPearson


Well, it's Thursday, and today IBM is having a major launch for storage. We have lots of exciting announcements today, so here is the major highlights:

IBM Storwize V7000 midrange disk system

Fellow blogger Rolf Potts just completed his [No Baggage Challenge], travelling around the world, twelve countries in six weeks with no luggage. I first learned of this trip from fellow published author and blogger Tim Ferriss in his post [How to Travel 12 Countries with No Baggage Whatsoever]. This trip was sponsored by a travel agency [BootsnAll.com] and travel clothing manufacturer [ScotteVest].

From New York, Rolf went to London, Paris, Madrid, Morocco, Cairo, South Africa, Bangkok Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand, Australia, and then back to United States. I was hoping to run into him while I was in Australia and New Zealand last month, but our schedules did not line up.

  Travelingwithout baggage is more than just a convenience, it is a metaphor for the philosophy that we should keep only what we need, and leave behind what we don't. This was the approach taken by IBM in the design of the IBM Storwize V7000 midrange disk system.

IBM Storwize V7000 disk system The IBM Storwize V7000 disk system consists of 2U enclosures. Controller enclosures have dual-controllers and drives. Expansion enclosures have just drives. Enclosures can have either 24 smaller form factor (SFF) 2.5-inch drives, or twelve larger 3.5-inch drives. A controller enclosure can be connected up to nine expansion enclosures.

The drives are all connected via 6 Gbps SAS, and come in a variety of speeds and sizes: 300GB Solid-State Drive (SSD); 300GB/450GB/600GB high-speed 10K RPM; and 2TB low-speed 7200 RPM drives. The 12-bay enclosures can be intermixed with 24-bay enclosures on the same system, and within an enclosure different speeds and sizes can be intermixed. A half-rack system (20U) could hold as much as 480TB of raw disk capacity.

This new system, freshly designed entirely within IBM, competes directly against systems that carry a lot of baggage, including the HDS AMS, HP EVA, an EMC CLARiiON CX4 systems. Instead, we decided to keep the what we wanted from our other successful IBM products.

  • Inspired by our successful XIV storage system, IBM has developed a web-based GUI that focuses on ease-of-use. This GUI uses the latest HTML5 and dojo widgets to provide an incredible user experience.
  • Borrowed from our IBM DS8000 high-end disk systems, state-of-the-art device adapters provide 6 Gbps SAS connectivity with a variety of RAID levels: 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10.
  • From our SAN Volume Controller, the embedded [ SVC 6.1 firmware] provides all of the features and functions normally associated with enterprise-class systems, including Easy Tier sub-LUN automated tiering between Solid-State Drives and Spinning disk, thin provisioning, external disk virtualization, point-in-time FlashCopy, disk mirroring, built-in migration capability, and long-distance synchronous and asynchronous replication.

To learn more on this, read the [announcement letter], [landing page], [product page], [services page], as well as the blog posts from fellow master inventor and blogger Barry Whyte (IBM) at his [Storage Virtualization] blog.

My New Book is Now Available!

Finally, the various "internal NDA" that kept me from publishing this sooner have expired, so now I have the long-awaited [Inside System Storage: Volume II], documenting IBM's transformation in its storage strategy, including behind-the-scenes commentary about IBM's acquisitions of XIV and Diligent. Available initially in paperback form. I am still working on the hard cover and eBook editions.

For those who have not yet read my first book, Inside System Storage: Volume I, it is still available from my publisher Lulu, in [hard cover], [paperback] and [eBook] editions.

Book cover
IBM System Storage DS8800

A lesson IBM learned long ago was not to make radical changes to high-end disk systems, as clients who run mission-critical applications are more concerned about reliability, availability and serviceability than they are performance or functionality. Shipping any product before it was ready meant painfully having to fix the problems in the field instead.

(EMC apparently is learning this same lesson now with their VMAX disk system. Their Engenuity code from Symmetrix DMX4 was ported over to new CLARiiON-based hardware. With several hundred boxes in the field, they have already racked up over 150 severity 1 problems, roughly half of these resulted in data loss or unavailability issues. For the sake of our mutual clients that have both IBM servers and EMC disk, I hope they get their act together soon.)

To avoid this, IBM made incremental changes to the successful design and architecture of its predecessors. The new DS8800 shares 85 percent of the stable microcode from the DS8700 system. Functions like Metro Mirror, Global Mirror, and Metro/Global Mirror, are compatible with all of the previous models of the DS8000 series, as well as previous models of the IBM Enterprise Storage Server (ESS) line.

hot-aisle-cold-aisle The previous models of DS8000 series were designed to take in cold air from both front and back, and route the hot air out the top, known as chimney design. However, many companies are re-arranging their data centers into separate cold aisles and hot aisles. The new DS8800 has front-to-back cooling to help accommodate this design.

My colleague Curtis Neal would call the rest of this a "BFD" announcement, which of course stands for "Bigger, Faster and Denser". The new DS8800 scales-up to more drives than its DS8700 predecessor, and can scale-out from a single-frame 2-way system to a multi-frame 4-way system. IBM has upgraded to faster 5GHz POWER6+ processors, with dual-core 8 Gbps FC and FICON host adapters, 8 Gbps device adapters, and 6 Gbps SAS connectivity to smaller form factor (SFF) 2.5-inch SAS drives. IBM Easy Tier will provide sub-LUN automated tiering between Solid-State Drives and spinning disk. The denser packaging with SFF drives means that we can pack over 1000 drives in only three frames, compared to five frames required for the DS8700.

To learn more, read the [landing page] or the announcement letters for the machine types [2421], [2422], [2423], [2424].

IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller v6.1

The [IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller] software release v6.1 brings Easy Tier sub-LUN automated tiering to the rest of the world. IBM Easy Tier moves the hottest, most active extents up to Solid-State Drives (SSD) and moves the coldest, least active down to spinning disk. This works whether the SSD is inside the SVC 2145-CF8 nodes, or in the managed disk pool.

Tired of waiting for EMC to finally deliver FAST v2 for your VMAX? It has been 18 months since they first announced that someday they would have sub-LUN automatic tiering. What is taking them so long? Why not virtualize your VMAX with SVC, and you can have it sooner!

SVC 6.1 also upgrades to a sexy new web-based GUI, which like the one for the IBM Storwize V7000, is based on the latest HTML5 and dojo widget standards. Inspired by the popular GUI from the IBM XIV Storage System, this GUI has greatly improved ease-of-use.

To learn more, read the [announcement letter] and [SVC product page].

These are just a subset of today's announcements. To see the rest, read [What's New].

technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

10 comments
8 views

Permalink

Comments

Mon October 25, 2010 07:43 PM

Originally posted by: TonyPearson


Jean-Marc,

For the IBM Storwize V7000 midrange disk system, here is the link: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/storwize_v7000/index.html

For the IBM ProtecTIER data deduplication solution, there are several models, from the TS7610 up to the TS7680G, here is the link for all of them: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/tape/

Thanks, Tony P (az990tony)

Mon October 25, 2010 11:31 AM

Originally posted by: Jean-MarcPICCOLO


I participated last week at a strategy and new IBM storage product show. We have an interest for V7000 Storwize and TierProtect. Could you give me any information about these products ? Thanks,

Fri October 15, 2010 10:59 AM

Originally posted by: 3CJR_Óscar_Luis_Rojas_Fernánde


NIce summary Tony. It is in fact a very dense announcement and a brief like yours does help to better understand it. Also I read your interchange with Barry. I also read his blog regularly and I have to say that I expected more from him. His points were surprisingly weak and his comments were tarnished with personal attacks. Keep the good job Tony and Barry: you can do better.

Tue October 12, 2010 02:57 PM

Originally posted by: TonyPearson


Re:......Can we expect the clock on THIS generation DS8K to keep the correct time?

I guess it speaks volumes of IBM DS8000's quality that the only problem you can think of was the "Clock Problem" that was found and fixed a long time ago back in May 2005 in the earliest model of the 2105, and hasn't re-occurred since on any generation since then.

Nobody is buying your argument that most of the DU/DL data unavailability and data loss defects were found internally during your post-GA testing department. To any customer, most of the defects are found by others, so it doesn't matter if it is the customer across the street, a customer in a different country, or EMC's internal post-GA testing Quality Assurance (QA) team. What does matter is that these problems existed in the versions of code that customers have on the floor, and that is what scares them. Nobody likes installing mandatory disruptive fixes in the field.

So until EMC VMAX has sub-LUN automated tiering functionality that competes against IBM Easy Tier, or until EMC is "transparent" about its performance on the VMAX such as publishing SPC-1 and SPC-2 benchmarks, I guess we will have to just focus on reliability and availability as differentiators.

TonyP (az990tony)

Thu October 07, 2010 07:29 PM

Originally posted by: TonyPearson


Barry, You didn't read down far enough. I know, our announcement letters are terribly long. Since reliability is important to IBM, we forked off DS8700 R5.0 level to give our testers more time to test. The functions you mentioned that released in R5.1 came after the fork, but we did not want to impact our test efforts for the new hardware in the DS8800. If you read further down any of the four machine types, such as [http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS110-215], you will find that IBM plans to merge back in the R5.1 features of the DS8700 by the first half of 2011: Statement of direction

It is IBM's current plan and direction to release a single version of machine code that can be used with either the DS8700 or the DS8800. Both products will then support the same functionality and have a common machine code base. IBM is also planning to offer an option for 8Gb host adapters within the DS8700 to support increased host server bandwidth. This is in response to the increased adoption of 8Gb Host/SAN environments in enterprise datacenters. IBM intends this release to be available in the first half of 2011.

The foregoing represents IBM's current plans and direction only. Such plans and direction are subject to change or withdrawal without notice.

Thu October 07, 2010 10:31 AM

Originally posted by: thestorageanarchist


One more thing about your malicious FUD: EMC documents ALL of the issues found in the release notes, no matter the source. And almost ALL of the DU/DL risks that are identified are found in our continuing QA process and most of these are corner cases that have NEVER been experienced by customers. We find 'em, we fix 'em and we let our customers know. Now, please, put down the rocks and crawl back inside your glass house. You've managed to derail your own announcement coverage by including several petty and malicious FUD attacks... Like I said, given the market share gains that VMAX has earned over the past 18 months, I'm not surprised. I wonder what else you're trying to hide behind that smokescreen...

Thu October 07, 2010 10:05 AM

Originally posted by: thestorageanarchist


Here's the glass house, sir (from your own launch materials): Other limitations The following functions are currently not available on DS8800: • Quick initialization and thin provisioning support • Remote Pair FlashCopy support • Easy Tier support • Multiple Global Mirror session support • z/HPF extended distance capability support • z/OS distributed data backup support • IBM Disk full page protection support • 16 TB LUN size is not available Not only NOT AVAILABLE, but NO DATES GIVEN either (in this document anyway). Could it be that the DS8800 was "rushed to market prematurely?" Why aren't these features shipping? Do they still have too many bugs? When they ship, will they be 100% bug-free? And Enquiring Minds want to know: ......Can we expect the clock on THIS generation DS8K to keep the correct time?

Thu October 07, 2010 09:29 AM

Originally posted by: TonyPearson


Barry,

Did you miss the paragraph where I mention that IBM itself had similar quality problems a long time ago and had already learned the painful lesson that EMC is learning now? IBM calls them "Client Impact Events" or CIE. The terms and acronyms might be different, but the idea is the same.

I agree that EMC's DMX3 and DMX4 also had quality issues, following the same ship-it-early and fix-it-in-the-field approach. I was trying to be nice to not bring that up, and just focus on your current product.

So, yes, IBM had quality problems in the past and was transparent about them, and EMC has its problems too and is transparent about them now also, so it is more of a case of the pot, which had been black many years ago, is calling the kettle now black.

However, I don't think "glass houses" applies in this case. If EMC is going to announce that they will deliver FAST v2 sub-LUN automated tiering, and then not deliver it for more than 18 months on their VMAX, then I am not sure how that is a "glass house" situation? Everyone understands the reason EMC is unable to deliver new functionality is because it is too busy fixing existing quality problems. I am not exposing any EMC secrets of this over-promise/under-deliver situation, and am not even the first blogger to bring it up. IBM has Easy Tier, on the other hand, already in the DS8700 and now announced for the DS8800, the new Storwize V7000 and the SAN Volume Controller.

In the interest of transparency, that both of our employers deem important, you are welcome to share with us the exact number of VMAX boxes sold to date, exact number of Severity 1 problems and how many involved data loss or unavailability if you feel my generalizations are inaccurate or misrepresentative. For now, I will edit the post to say 'several hundred' since you feel "few hundred" is misleading.

Tony (az990tony)

Thu October 07, 2010 06:55 AM

Originally posted by: thestorageanarchist


By the way, I had tried to honor my own admonishions against attempts to benefit from others mistakes, as I wrote about here: http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2010/07/3008-shame-on-all-of-us.html In my transparency article, I even avoided specifying which company was trying to use EMC's transparency against us. You've removed any doubt about who has been resorting to this vile and despicable approach to competing with this post. And I must admit, I was shocked by your (misinformed) attacks on EMC about an outage at a state government earlier this year, especially since the bank outage referenced in my above-linked post was caused by your own employer. Your FUD conjours images of pots, kettles and glass houses...

Thu October 07, 2010 06:39 AM

Originally posted by: thestorageanarchist


Tony, you are an embarrassment to the industry. VMAX has far more than a "few hundred" arrays in the field, and is deployed around the globe supporting the most mission-critical operations of thousands of companies. Granted, VMAX success is challenging to IBM - so I'm not surprised that you continuously resort to FUD rather than differentiation. The fact is, VMAX is the most reliable and highly available Symmetrix in its entire history, and your FUD is based upon data you find in our release notes as I described in this post: http://thestorageanarchist.typepad.com/weblog/2010/06/300 5-why-transparency.html