You may not be able to do this if you are an ancient hardware (I believe we added it in 8.3ish).
you don't want to have a 4 drive array though. How you move forward depends on if you have swing space, a newer/in support set of hardware and how important your existing data is to you.
Best practices would be to have a single 16 drive mdisk0 array as well as you SSD array in that pool.
Original Message:
Sent: Mon August 05, 2024 02:44 PM
From: Ramon Medina
Subject: not compatible with the existing storage in the pool
Thanks for your response Evelyn, I understand and agree.
One question, I have a Pool with a mdisk0 (12x 2.18TB hdd draid 6) and a mdisk1 (4x 400GB ssd draid5), I want to add 4x 2.18TB hdd to the mdisk0 for a total of 16 hhd. It is possible to make that configuration. When I try to add the disks Im getting the same error "Not Compatible with the existing storage in the Pool".
Thanks,
Ramon Medina
------------------------------
Ramon Medina
Original Message:
Sent: Thu August 01, 2024 04:53 AM
From: Evelyn Perez
Subject: not compatible with the existing storage in the pool
I recommend you check out the IBM Documentation which has an extensive CLI guide: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/flashsystem-7x00/8.7.x?topic=reference-managed-disk-commands
HOWEVER! I caution you about going straight to the CLI. This isn't a thing "Architects considered suboptimal", We are trying to prevent you from creating configurations that can lead to performance or balancing issues.
Modern builds you should be using DRAID and expanding it, not adding mdisks. Moreover, in some cases (such as with multiple compressing arrays using FCMs) you can cause conditions that drive the capacity out of space which is why this is prevented.
There are best practices and then there are bad ideas. When it comes to the RAID config we remove things that are a bad idea, while still letting you do some things that might be against best practices. So buyer beware - if you go do this and you suffer a performance issue or have a problem on rebuild its because you weren't following the built in system guidance on how to configure the RAID arrays.
------------------------------
Evelyn Perez
IBM Senior Technical Staff Member
IBM Storage Virtualize Software Architect for SVC and FlashSystem
Original Message:
Sent: Wed July 31, 2024 09:12 AM
From: Ramon Medina
Subject: not compatible with the existing storage in the pool
Hi Apostolos,
Another long time later, ;-)
Could you share the CLI command to add the mdisk to existing pool?
Thanks,
Ramon Medina
------------------------------
Ramon Medina
Original Message:
Sent: Wed March 29, 2023 10:49 AM
From: Apostolos Gkavanozis
Subject: not compatible with the existing storage in the pool
Hi, long time later...
It worked via CLI
------------------------------
Apostolos Gkavanozis
Original Message:
Sent: Thu July 28, 2022 04:26 AM
From: Community Support Admin
Subject: not compatible with the existing storage in the pool
HI,
I have a similar case on FS9150 2way cluster which require to add another mdisk with 9x FCMs with the same type to existing pool.
But the same message occurred when creating it on GUI.
Could i ask you how to solve it at that time ?
#Storwize
#Support
#SupportMigration