Our plan is to store all backups to AWS S3 as much as possible, thus, to save the storage footprint in our Data Center. We are considering to migrate SP to SPP.
Based on what I have learned and researched, with SPP, basically it requires the same amount of how much full backups need, and then deduct savings by deduplication. Then, additional incremental backups can be stored in S3. So, if I have 500TB total of backups, and assuming I can save 1/3 by using deduplication, then I just need about 333TB local capacity. If I check out blueprint, this is approximate size I am getting.
However, with SP, all I need for the local capacity just depend on how much landing path I need, in which case, a few TB would be good enough.
So, my question is, why is there such difference?
------------------------------
vkk
------------------------------