We're in the comgas (compass energy oil & gas, an ráizen [cosan and shell joint venture]) in plugue desafio hackathon.deliveries. Work plan for the 10th and pitch for the 15th of January.1. Convert diesel oil generator (passive, runs 26 minutes year TIER IV) into full time natural gas active generator, with 10x the nominal capacity. Formerly a 100 MW datacenter has a 110 MW generator, now 1 GW as with 900 MW plugged into the grid as revenue.https://earth.google.com/web/data=Mj8KPQo7CiExWjRFakdUUTVFUUZUcnpZbmhDUzZoSktiZVZ6YTU3TzYSFgoUMDExRDBCNjI5QjFFREZBQzYzQUQ2. attach datacenter in thermal plants to hydrocarbons or nuclear and convert waste heat to cold for ibm system z liquid server.https://grabcad.com/library/mellieri-nwcl-1To validate 1, we need 100% cloud redundancy because we will no longer have oil generators. Now TIER X and PUE negative.Then we did an exercise. And if, it doesn't have power or cooling, what happens? We found the IBM SAO01 failure report wrong.We set up the first digital switches in the country (1991/92) and one of the things we did in tests was cut power and cooling to see how redundant systems behaved. Doesn't seem like this happens with datacenters?We discovered in the previous message that in an internet failure, the blame and responsibility goes to the infrastructure layer, not the OSI layer) but the utilities layer (cold water, energy) and attests that the datacenter has no redundancy.not to the fact that applications are still hostage to infra when they must be separated at the OSI layer. The application must be independent from the Infra (server, networks, routers, etc.), that is, if I fail the infra the application remains numba good. An atomic bomb dropped, the application remains in the air and the message reaches its destination.We looked to IBM Brazil and they recognized that the failure report is wrong. As it is, if there is another infra failure the server crashes again. We were informed of the correction and awaiting evidence.Okay, my infra is 100%. I can't be sure, as the cloud is one thing. One node failed, the others fail, because if one node is infra-dependent, all the others are affected as it shows that there was no redundancy.This is what the fathers of the Brazilian internet and the creator of TCP-IP claim at the 25th of commemoration of the Brazilian internet.This vulnerability weakens IBM against take overhttps://www.abranet.org.br/Abranet25anos/Vint-Cerf-3604.html?UserActiveTemplate=siteWith 5G, I suspect that erlang/elixir this will improve, as availability is 99.9999999, or downtime of less than 1 second (in 20 years), but we need a 100% redundant cloud solution until pitch day, January 15th.4. We need the system z server liquid coling infrastructure to be the new The birth of the IBM PC: The birth of the IBM Professional ComputerOpen source specications and cad dwg components along the open compute, open mainframe and open system templateshttps://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg248851.pdf5. We made this suggestion to the OPC and now the don asks us for a case study to attach the datacenter integrated to thermoelectric plants converting waste heat into cold to serve the energy-hungry servers.