Hi there:
Apologies in advance for asking this question ... but typically when you are moving large amounts of data between TM1 cubes, it is better to write a TurboIntegrator (TI) process to do it so my question is - is there a reason why you are NOT doing that?
Actually, I realize there are quite a few reasons why you might not use a TI including (for example):
- The Excel logic is quite intricate and complicated, and it would be difficult to reverse engineer, or perhaps it changes often
- The person who owns this process is not familiar with TI script, and feels better able to control the logic from Excel with DBSW
- We could but we do this so rarely that it is not worth the effort of developing the TI
- Just don't have time!
These are all perfectly good reasons.
All that said, here are some reasons why you might find value in shifting to TI:
- You can end up with a much more robust process (if done properly)
- The processing time will likely drop from minutes to seconds (which doesn't matter if you do not do this often)
Obviously I don't know all the details of your situation, and I do not mean to second-guess you - but I guess I am just curious. Is it for one of the reasons I mentioned, or for some reason I did not think of?
Many thanks,
AG
------------------------------
Ann-Grete Tan
Chief Strategy & Marketing Officer
QueBIT Consulting
Analyze. Plan. Achieve.
https://quebit.com------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Tue January 26, 2021 11:22 PM
From: mvp morgan
Subject: Cell Number Limit for DBSW?
Hi, I am experiencing an issue and it looks like there is some limit on the number of DBSW formulas when sending data back to a cube.
The file originally works fine for writing data back in Perspectives and it takes around 10 minutes to complete.
When I put it with PAfE v55, it refreshed but not sending any values to the cube at all no matter what I tried(F9,Shift+F9,Crtl+Alt+F9,Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F9, etc). I reduced the number of DBSW cells (just deleting lines) back to around 220,000 cells and it worked.
I would expect better performance in PAfE without changing anything in the original file and didn't have any impression that IBM put any limits on that?
------------------------------
mvp morgan
------------------------------
#PlanningAnalyticswithWatson